User talk:GisborneCityArchivist

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gisborne City AFC have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gisborne City AFC was changed by GisborneCityArchivist (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.924576 on 2026-06-05T04:25:52+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:25, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for reviewing the draft.

I’m trying to understand the concerns so I can improve the article. You stated that it “consists of machine-generated text”, but I’m not sure which passages you’re referring to.

The article was compiled from the cited reliable sources, and my aim was to stay as close as possible to what those sources support while avoiding unsourced interpretation.

Could you please identify the specific sentences or sections that led you to conclude it was machine-generated? Without concrete examples, I’m not sure what changes you’re asking me to make.

I’d appreciate any specific feedback so I can address it. GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you attenpted to make to John Drummond (New Zealand astronomer), as LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

See filter log. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:44, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to post comments on Wikipedia generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology), as you did at User talk:GisborneCityArchivist, you may be blocked from editing. ‑‑gurkubondinn 14:22, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

"You've accused me twice now of using AI, but you haven't shown me a single edit, sentence, or source that you think is problematic.

For the record: I'm not a new editor. I edited Wikipedia over 10 years ago, just under a different account. I also have an English teaching background and a physics background. I'm autistic, so I write in a very structured and precise way.

If you have evidence of AI use, show it to me. If not, please stop leaving warnings without proof." GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 15:04, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Here is the complete, corrected Wikipedia source code with all citations fixed and wikilinks added. Copy and paste this directly into the Wikipedia editor.

```{{Short description|New Zealand astronomer and science communicator}}

...```

---

Go to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Drummond_(New_Zealand_astronomer), click "Create this page", paste everything above, and submit.
— AbuseLog/44549319

I hope that sufficies, @GisborneCityArchivist? ‑‑gurkubondinn 17:40, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi GisborneCityArchivist. Please do not use Playmakerstats as a reference. It was categorised as unreliable; see WP:WPFLINKSNO for details and other unreliable football sources. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 00:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

no problem my bad will fix asap GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 01:47, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

When is "asap"? There is still one instance of Playmakerstats being used and I've seen you make other edits in the meantime. Robby.is.on (talk) 11:25, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry I removed the second playmakerstats thought I only had one hopefully it’s all good now GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 22:35, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

No problem. All is well now. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, GisborneCityArchivist. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Gisborne City AFC, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. We ask that you:

• Avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors
• Disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI)
• Propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions
• Avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming)

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation for any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

See the FAQ for article subjects for more information.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Malgosha 13:56, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the notice. I am not employed by, compensated by, or acting on behalf of Gisborne City AFC. The club is defunct and I no longer live in Gisborne. However, I do have a personal connection to the club as a former player and lifetime supporter. My interest is in improving the sourcing, accuracy, and preservation of the club’s historical record using reliable published sources so that its history remains available to future readers. GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 14:20, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

I just wanted to make sure you didn't have a conflict of interest on that article, thanks. Malgosha 14:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Angela Cudd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it has too many errors of formatting. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zackmann (<sup>Talk to me</sup>/<sub>What I been doing</sub>) 04:30, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. I've addressed the issues you raised:

- Added multiple independent reliable sources (NZ Herald, NZ On Screen, SPADA, WIFT NZ, Pacific Scoop, Bevan Crothers)

- Expanded the Education and Awards sections

- Removed promotional language and neutralized the tone

- Fixed formatting errors

The draft has been resubmitted for review.

Cheers,

GisborneCityArchivist GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 06:36, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Angela Cudd. Thanks! Zackmann (<sup>Talk to me</sup>/<sub>What I been doing</sub>) 15:01, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi Zackmann,

I've removed all IMDb citations and replaced them with reliable sources (NZ On Screen, Big Screen Symposium, WIFT NZ, and NZ Film Commission). Please review when you get a chance.

Thanks GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 00:30, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to David Ure (footballer). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 12:48, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

"I've posted my conflict of interest disclosure on the talk page. You flagged the article as 'machine-generated text' but didn't specify what needs changing. If you can point to a specific passage or section that reads as problematic, I'm happy to rephrase it. Otherwise, I'll be resubmitting the draft as-is." GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 13:55, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

"I've made some changes — fixed the red links, removed sponsor names, and cleaned up the references. I'm not sure exactly what you wanted me to change, but I've fixed what I could find. Let me know if there's anything else you want me to look at." GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 14:14, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on John Drummond (New Zealand astronomer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ‑‑gurkubondinn 17:32, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Lennard Cudd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 17:46, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Jimmy Cudd. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 17:49, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

"I've reviewed the Jimmy Cudd article against the feedback you flagged. I've removed the children's names, removed the taxi conviction, fixed the age error in 1993, corrected the Hawke's Bay timeline, and removed the training squad and over-age teams from the infobox (they're still in the prose).

If there's anything else that breaches Wikipedia rules, let me know — I don't know every rule, and I don't assume anyone does.

We're all volunteers doing this for free. I'm not trying to do the wrong thing here. I'm just trying to help." GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 21:57, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

There are two rules that are relevant for you:

• WP:NOLLM: you're not permitted to use LLMs ("AI", chatbots, etc) to edit
• WP:AITALK: you're also not permitted to use LLMs to communicate either

‑‑gurkubondinn 22:01, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Look gronk I’m a volunteer I do this for free I don’t care what you do stop power tripping bitch I was just trying to help I know all of these people personally or I’m related to them do what ever you want you no dick cunt i don’t give a fuck delete me cancel me whatever bitch GisborneCityArchivist (talk) 22:21, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello @GisborneCityArchivist. I presume that these comments are directed at me? Please refrain from leaving WP:NASTY comments to other editors, it is important that we act WP:CIVIL to each other here.

If you want to move ahead constructively, all I ask of you is that you address your use of AI/LLM. You might find the WP:USED-AI? essay helpful for this. As I have pointed out to you before, the WP:NOLLM guideline means that we are not permitted to use these tools here on English Wikipedia.

You should also be aware of WP:COISELF, you are strongly discouraged from writing about yourself or people that you know. The reason is that it is very hard, for anyone, to write from a neutral WP:NPOV perspective about people that we know (and presumably also like).

‑‑gurkubondinn 22:58, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Charlie Ure. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 23:23, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Josh Wharehinga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ‑‑gurkubondinn 23:30, 30 June 2026 (UTC)