User talk:Gocrazy69

Hello, and welcome! This is the talk page for User:Gocrazy69. Please use this space to leave me a note, start a discussion, or collaborate on any of the articles I’ve worked on.

I check messages regularly, and I’m happy to discuss improvements, formatting, sourcing, or content ideas related to Wikipedia’s coverage of entrepreneurship, fashion, technology, and creative industries.

How to contact me

Click the **"Add topic"** tab at the top of this page to start a new discussion.
Please sign your messages using four tildes: ~~~~ — this automatically adds your username and timestamp.
Keep discussions civil and on-topic, following Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines.

About this page

This talk page is public and part of Wikipedia’s open discussion system.
If you’re replying to a comment here, please **stay on the same page** for context — I’ll do the same when replying to you.
For off-topic or informal questions, you can leave a note, and I’ll decide if it’s best to move it to the relevant article talk page.

Quick links

User:Gocrazy69 – My user page
Special:Contributions/Gocrazy69 – My edit history
Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines – How to use talk pages effectively
Wikipedia:Assume good faith – Key principle for collaboration

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Nigam

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sanjay Nigam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:

Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., "Here is your Wikipedia article on..."), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., "Up to my last training update ..."), self-insertion (e.g., "as a large language model"), and phrasal templates (e.g., "Smith was born on [Birth Date].")
Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.

Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. JTtheOG (talk) 18:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)

Honesty is appreciated

I have moved your article to Draft:Sanjay Nigam for further improvement. Just looking at it, the hallmarks of being written by an LLM were obvious. An AI detection tool showed a 100% probability that it was AI generated, in spite of your claim that you wrote it yourself from scratch. The sources cited are either written by the subject, or churnalism press releases, or trivial mentions. This was not ready for mainspace. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 18:09, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Sanjay Nigam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanjay Nigam, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Nigam until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of Fashion Entrepreneur Fund for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fashion Entrepreneur Fund, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fashion Entrepreneur Fund until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.