User talk:JTtheOG

Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2026 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor, we hope the WikiCup will give you a chance to improve your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here, and a bot will set up your submissions page within one day, ready for you to take part. Any questions on the scoring, rules or anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page.

For the 2026 WikiCup, the highest-ranking contestants will receive tournament points at the end of each round, and final rankings are decided by the number of tournament points each contestant has. This is the same scoring system that we had last year. If you're busy and can't sign up in January, don't worry: Signups are open throughout the year. To make things fairer for latecomers, the lowest-scoring contestants are no longer eliminated at the end of each round.

The first round will end on 26 February. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), Epicgenius (talk · contribs · email), Frostly (talk · contribs · email), Guerillero (talk · contribs · email) and Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs · email). Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi lol Whyiseverythingalreadyused (t · c · he/him) 02:25, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Ed Carberry is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Robot Parade -- The Robot Parade (talk) 02:26, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

On 9 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kaleena Smith, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Kaleena Smith received her first NCAA Division I offer to play college basketball as a pre-teen? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kaleena Smith. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kaleena Smith), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—Ganesha811 (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

On 15 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Brandon Arrington, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Brandon Arrington broke track meet records held by Olympic gold medalists Noah Lyles and Michael Norman? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Brandon Arrington. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Brandon Arrington), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

—TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:20, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

On 16 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Fernando Mayén, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Fernando Mayén was named the top college football player in Mexico in 2023 after leading the nation with 14 touchdowns? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Fernando Mayén. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Fernando Mayén), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello which source(s) are unreliable on the “Magickal Weirdness” page? I coulda sworn there was actually one that said “blog” or something on its link, (which ik is a no go) however it is not a blog it is a dedicated music review website. And it also no longer says “blog” anywhere. I also did add one more source this morning. But I can make any revisions later today if required. Splashmoney15 (talk) 15:39, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@Splashmoney15: Hey there. Nice work on your album articles. I tagged this one because Firstherd is a blog created using WP:WORDPRESS, as stated at the top and bottom of the website. JTtheOG (talk) 19:30, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Ed Carberry has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of The Robot Parade -- The Robot Parade (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Very appreciative of your time and thoughtfulness. Will be expanding and improving. Minard38 (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

@Minard38: Happy to help. Congrats on your work. Happy editing! JTtheOG (talk) 06:14, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

More information Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl ...

Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl
You are invited to Wikipedia Day 2026 - BunnyBowl, hosted by WikiLatinos with the support of the WikiProject Latino and Hispanic heritage & WikiProject Latin music. Help us celebrate the 25th birthday of Wikipedia and the historic Superbowl performance of Bad Bunny! Together we will improve Wikipedia's coverage of Puerto Rican artists, cultural movements, and the social realities affecting our latino communities. You’re also welcome to join our WikiLatinos Discord channel to participate in the editing parties hosted during the contest.
Contests dates: From January 15 (Wikipedia Day) until February 8, 2026 (SuperBowl LX). All participants are subject to our Code of Conduct.

Close

Oscar_. (talk) 14:17, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello! I've finished what I could of theDYK review of your article on Blanca Quiñónez. I only had a few issues with it but it seems very well put together! Thank you for your work on it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

@Andrzejbanas: Hey! Thanks for taking this. I will be getting to this soon! JTtheOG (talk) 06:13, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

		New Page Reviewer of the Year
		Congrats on being chosen as reviewer of the year, for 2025! Your username has been permanently engraved on the cup. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

If you want, you may add this userbox to your user page: {{Wikipedia:New pages patrol/CoY userbox|year=2025}} -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:46, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

@MPGuy2824: Thank you my friend! Appreciate all your hard work on the backend. JTtheOG (talk) 19:23, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Wow, New Page Reviewer of the Year. Congrats!

Continuing our conversation from Beanie's talk page... Do you ever look at AfC? I feel like the vast majority of drafts are AI-assisted. Seriously, it's crazy. I basically just assume that any "newbie" AfC draft is AI-assisted unless proven otherwise (and new users are the only ones using AfC anyway). I pretty much only look at FloridaArmy's drafts nowadays because I know that he's doing stuff manually. I think a lot of articles from new users in the NPP feed are AI-assisted too. It's hard to tell sometimes though. People can rework the article to get rid of the easy AI "tells" while still leaving in hallucinations.

For example, I think short articles like this could even be AI-assisted. There aren't any typos and the references are formatted neatly (see this from the same user for further evidence). I believe this from a different user is definitely AI-assisted. When I write long articles I always have typos while that article doesn't have any. The lack of typos or grammar mistakes in new articles (short or long) nowadays is really telling. And those are literally the first articles I clicked on.

Sorry if this is long-winded. Do you come across AI a lot when doing NPP? ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 16:23, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for messaging you again before you even had a chance to respond to my original message but I wanted to add some further evidence for my suspicions. I've left PutABoatOnTheWater a message in the past about using AI to generate articles but I believe they are still doing it. KiJuan Ware is a long article and has no grammar mistakes. (And yes I'm just linking URLs instead of piping because I don't want to give someone a linking notification somehow. Not trying to call anyone out, just listing examples lol) 10 years ago, very few newbie sports editors were making "perfect" start-class articles like this without any mistakes. And that article pretty much is perfect except for the lack of SIGCOV.

Thanks for enduring my rant. Sorry for being annoying. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 18:00, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

@WikiOriginal-9: Hey! A large part of what I do at NPP is knocking out short articles from very experienced editors (i.e. politicians meeting NPOL, towns meeting NGEO, bugs meeting NSPECIES, young footballers meeting NSPORT, disambs, etc.), many of which should probably be autopatrolled by now (I should make that initiative tbf). My eyes just gravitate towards the same usernames I've seen dozens or hundreds of times.

When I spot AI language, I quickly check the sources to see if the article could qualify for G15. I'm really glad they added that criteria. But yeah, this wave of AI content has made me extremely weary of reviewing, for example, species articles any longer than 2 or 3 sentences. Anything more than that, and I get suspicious because of how easy it is to conceal now. Or articles on military subjects... Aside from being out of my wheelhouse, lots of articles on battles or army units just reek of LLM usage now, but I could say the same for many topics. So I mostly stick to sports, politics, geography, as well as my previously mentioned frequent customers.

I think I tried reviewing some AfC drafts a while back after being invited to the process, but I was unable to figure it out. Maybe you could help me get back into it? And yeah, I think it's not a bad idea to assume that a large proportion of the newbie userbase is unfortunately using AI in some way or another. This is probably more true for non-native English speakers, to whom I imagine AI-generated language sounds very well-written.

As for the examples, that's a good point about perfect grammar. There's also something about the way it's so succinctly summarized and organized, almost as if gathered and put together by a computer..... Cuz there's the long-winded, flowery language (droning on about underscoring, highlighting, reflecting the importance of blahblah), but there's also this perfectly(?) executed short&sweet summary of facts that it does now too. But yes, it will only get harder and harder to tell as both LLM tools improve and editors better learn how to use them (and how to hide their use). (Also, *criollismo* is 100% a sign of AI use, right? I always find it funny when the LLM messes up the markup.)

P.S. doesn't the Ware article pretty much just very closely paraphrase the sources? JTtheOG (talk) 19:36, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

You stated all that perfectly. Great catch about *criollismo*. I didn't see that. As for Ware, I'm just skeptical of any long drafts that have perfect grammar and spelling....

I know what you mean about those obscure military articles. I always skip those... ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:43, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Alas, editors that were on Usenet back in the day may have an ingrained habit of using * ... * for emphasis: I catch myself doing it approximately daily. M kuhner (talk) 21:02, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

On 23 January 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caden Pinnick, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Caden Pinnick's first two career touchdowns in college football were retroactively voided? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caden Pinnick. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Caden Pinnick), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Sorry for disturbing you, i am a new editor; Can i ask what does "reviewed page" mean and what are the consequences of it? And tell me if i have to do any significant change for this page. Thank you and have a good day Alessandro User (talk) 08:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Alessandro User: Hello and welcome! I hope you stay around to continue to contribute to the world's best collection of knowledge. It just means that a new page reviewer has checked the page for problems such as adequate sourcing or copyright violations. No changes are necessary. Nice work. JTtheOG (talk) 21:15, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you; i hoped for a mark change XD (only got a C on the last 6 pages i created). Have a nice day Alessandro User (talk) 21:17, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

so i can delete the comment in talk page about the copyright problem?? Alessandro User (talk) 10:41, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Virgil Hooe has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Zzz plant -- Zzz plant (talk) 20:45, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG, I'm wondering why the two articles I created (2026 Arkansas Razorbacks football team and 2026 LSU Tigers football team) both fall under WP:DRAFTIFY? Sorry I'm late by the way. Dylan Hackworth1 (talk) 02:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@Dylan Hackworth1: Hey Dylan. As per WP:DRAFTREASON, Common reasons for incubating an article to draftspace as an alternative to deletion include... 3. The article is about an upcoming event or forthcoming work that is not notable yet, but likely to become so in the near future

The athletic program's website and fbschedules.com is not sufficient coverage to warrant an article with all empty sections nine months before the start of the season.

Please see the comments at Draft:2026 Alabama Crimson Tide football team, for example. I encourage you to work on the articles in draftspace, filling out information about the coaching staff and recruits/transfers with strong sources. Thank you. JTtheOG (talk) 19:28, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Themeparks (talk) 02:45, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

I appreciate your effort. however, please refrain from posting on my user talk page or reviewing my contributions. I find your edits to be non-constructive. Wieditor25 (talk) 03:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

@Wieditor25: There is no attempt being made at showing significant coverage of Buzunesh Gudeta or Anna Dibaba, which you recently recreated without improving. What am I to do when I come across these pages while reviewing new articles? JTtheOG (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

As I said I appreciate your contributions, but Wikipedia doesn't grant ownership of topics or entitlement. Please focus on constructive edits rather than following my edits. I just decided not to address them as they show patterns from the same contributor. Wieditor25 (talk) 03:51, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

You moved 2026 Kentucky Wildcats football team to draft space without stating a reason. Please justify this action. Thank you for your attention to this matter. rogerd (talk) 16:07, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

I have made several additions to the article with references about the new coaching staff, which as you know, is not unusual when a new head coach is hired. Again, I am concerned that you moved the article without explaining your reasons for doing so. I think you will find that it is referenced as well, if not better than similar articles of other 2026 SEC teams Auburn, Georgia and Missouri. --rogerd (talk) 02:13, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

As we have discussed elsewhere, consensus at the college football project is that we don't allow creation of season articles until the prior season has ended. We do permit such articles to be created, at a minimum for major teams, once the prior season has ended. Despite this consensus, you have in the past few days draftified several major college season articles, including such major teams as 2026 Kentucky Wildcats football team, 2026 LSU Tigers football team, 2026 Texas Longhorns football team, 2026 Purdue Boilermakers football team and 2026 Illinois Fighting Illini football team. I have now moved these back to main space. Let me know if you disagree. Cbl62 (talk) 13:19, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

• NOTE: I did not move some such articles back to mainspace which were of particularly low quality. E.g., Draft:2026 Oregon Ducks football team. Perhaps a broader discussion is needed at the college football project about minimum quality/content/sourcing standards for when an article can/should be allowed in main space. Cbl62 (talk) 13:29, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Seems reasonable enough. Thanks for the heads up. JTtheOG (talk) 20:37, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | February 2026, Vol 12, Issue 2, Nos 358, 359, 361, 362, 363 Online events: New: Alphabet run: countries starting with B | Black Women | Works by women: theatre, opera, music Continuing: #1day1woman ( year-long initiative) | Sports (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Join Wikipedia:26 for '26 and create or substantially improve twenty-six Wikipedia articles during the year 2026, at least one for each letter of the English alphabet. Tip of the month: Our redlists are a great resource, but not every redlinked subject is notable. Be sure to research before starting a new article. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Lajmmoore (talk 22:48, 31 January 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!

You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the super quick reviews of the redirects I made, it normally takes months! —blindlynx 21:03, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

On 5 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Caden Dowler, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that American football player Taco Dowler is the twin of a football player who was called "Burrito"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Caden Dowler. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Caden Dowler), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

JuniperChill (talk) 00:06, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing my page quickly! I’m not sure if I have any that aren’t reviewed yet, but if so I’d be grateful if you took a look! Cheers, Hayden Soloviev (talk) 01:10, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I would like to support keeping Shovon Ahmed article. The subject appears to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines because there is coverage from independent and reliable sources. I believe the article can be improved further by adding additional citations, improving neutrality, and expanding verifiable information. Deletion may remove useful encyclopedic content. Instead, improving sourcing and formatting would better align the article with Wikipedia standards. I am willing to help improve the article by adding reliable references and ensuring it follows Wikipedia policies. Arman360Editor (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

@Arman360Editor: Hey there. You are welcome to continue improving the article and also to participate in the deletion discussion. JTtheOG (talk) 03:27, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Velvet Hammer Music and Management Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Draftified - please consider draftification in lieu of speedy deletion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. asilvering (talk) 06:51, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

I checked every page created by the same creator, and every entry except two has been nominated for G3. Draft:REVOLVER Remix Championship is obviously LLM-generated, and while a user sandbox with the same topic has been G11 nominated, I don't think it is eligible for CSD. Unless you are sure that it meets G3. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 03:18, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JTtheOG, Thank you for reviewing 2025 Zee Cine Awards. It encourages me to create more new articles. I have started some other articles too, but they are still unnoticed, maybe you can review them too?

Zuck28 (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JTtheOG, I see you review A LOT of pages and are very familiar with American college football. I was wondering if you could review my draft Draft:Madden Williams Thank you for your time. Phenom Sports (talk) 20:41, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

On 9 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Immanuel Iheanacho, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Immanuel Iheanacho was measured as a 14-year-old freshman at 6 ft 6 in (1.98 m) and 325 lb (147 kg), with a 7 ft (2.1 m) wingspan? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Immanuel Iheanacho. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Immanuel Iheanacho), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 15,070 views (627.9 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hola, solo por si acaso, un amigo, que es novato y le estoy enseñando, está interesado en cubrir las reseñas parlamentarias. Aviso solo para dejar constancia de que no es cuenta títere ni nada por el estilo. Un abrazo; Carigval.97 (talk) 12:03, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

@Carigval.97: Hola, saludos. Gracias por el mensaje. ¿Cual es su nombre de usuario? Abrazo. JTtheOG (talk) 01:38, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

ElNavegante23,

En es-Wiki se dedica a temas de navegación colonial, acá en en-Wiki le interesó la cobertura parlamentaria, pero comenzó con navegación y espera retomar.

Que estés bien, saludos grandes!! Carigval.97 (talk) 02:22, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

On 11 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Diego García Miravete, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Diego García Miravete and his college football team's games were closely monitored by the Mexican government in the early 1970s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Diego García Miravete. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Diego García Miravete), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG, Thank you for reviewing all my new articles the past couple of months. Greatly appreciated. Cheers, Mill 1 (talk) 21:12, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

@Mill 1: Likewise, thanks for all the work you do. Happy editing, JTtheOG (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

On 14 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Titan Fleischmann, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when Titan Fleischmann's grandmother first heard her future grandson's name, she cried out of fear that he would be bullied for it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Titan Fleischmann. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Titan Fleischmann), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG! I discussed with you about the 2026 NDSU football page back in early January, and agreed with you that the page was too early. I have been maintaining and developing the page in Draftspace (Draft:2026 North Dakota State Bison football team. However, I just discovered that a page was created with the exact data from my draft article and put into articlespace. Both the draft and this new article exists. This was not me that did this, in fact more than before I think the article should stay in draftspace where I am maintaining it specifically because with the move to FBS - there is no schedule. The roster table on the page is incorrect since there is no 2026 roster yet and the ref link goes to the 2025 roster. I don't want to over step and propose deletion before I understand what exactly I should do here. Is proposing deletion the right thing here? Either way this article technically has no valid sources and the data on the entire page is invalid. Any advice you can give would be much appreciated!! Thanks! natethegreat4226 (talk) 06:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Natethegreat4226: Sorry to hear that. I've PRODded the article in hopes of clearing the way for your draft, which I think can definitely be moved to mainspace. Think of all the coverage that has come from the FBS move alone. I'm sure they've had changes to the coaching staff and plenty of transfer portal movement as well. Happy editing and good luck this season! JTtheOG (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! I will get to work and add some transfer portal and staff movement. I had the transfer portal on my todo list, but coach movement did not cross my mind. I figure once the MWC schedule is announced and the other sources are added, I will attempt to move it mainspace. Thank you again for your help, and yeah the Bison might need it! natethegreat4226 (talk) 06:20, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey @JTtheOG: this has seemingly happened again that someone got impatient and just created an 2026 NDSU football article to mainspace even though I have an open draft. Is there anything we can do about this? natethegreat4226 (talk) 17:30, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

On 17 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Gandy Malou-Mamel, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gandy Malou-Mamel first played basketball at age 12 wearing a shirt and tie? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Gandy Malou-Mamel. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Gandy Malou-Mamel), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Well done for all your work on this article. He clearly is notable after your efforts. Can I suggest the discography section is updated to distinguish between his mix tapes and albums, and also includes chart recognition as appropriate. You are clearly more able than I to extract references (always something of a problem from my side of The Pond), plus rappers are generally not my cup of tea. Many thanks. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Derek R Bullamore: Thanks Derek. I appreciate it. The funny thing is that I was sort of avoiding that section myself in hopes someone with more experience on music articles could lend a hand! But I could give it a shot. Cheers, JTtheOG (talk) 22:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome. I will keep the article on my watchlist and offer you a hand with the table(s) if you get stuck. If I can ! - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:46, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

@Derek R Bullamore: The problem can sometimes be distinguishing between albums and mixtapes. Early on, they're all mixtapes, but it can get hard to tell after they make their major label debut, since they might drop a mixtape here and there in between the albums. This gets especially difficult if their popularity dies down a bit after their initial success, since the releases stop getting as much media coverage explicitly describing them as one or the other. Plus, their labels might be less willing to spend the money on a full studio album. JTtheOG (talk) 05:29, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. When you have a moment to pause and take a break from demolishing the NPP backlog...please do consider signing up for the WP:MAR26 Unreferenced article backlog drive to once again defend your crown. (Note: We are going back to using the Edit summary tool (due to problems with the Hashtag summary method), so while we're encouraging editors to use [[WP:MAR26]] in their summaries, strictly speaking any text containing "MAR26" should work (#MAR26, etc.). Cielquiparle (talk) 07:11, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | March 2026, Vol 12, Issue 3, Nos 358, 359, 364, 365, 366 Online events: March 1-31: Artists & Activists | Artworks by women | Alphabet run: countries starting with C Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Celebrate Women Unreferenced articles backlog drive Wiki Loves Ramadan Tip of the month: Those experiencing difficulties with new articles can follow the guidance in our essays, perhaps starting with our Ten Simple Rules. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 09:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The first round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 26 February. As some of you may have noticed, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. This point increase has been retroactively applied to all good article reviews for which competitors have claimed points in this round. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 1 will advance to round 2 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 1 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points, and the top 16 contestants all scored more than 300 round points. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,467 round points, largely gained from 1 featured article, 5 featured lists, 15 good articles, and 42 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Olliefant (submissions) with 1,246 round points, largely from 4 featured lists, 9 good articles, 2 featured topic articles, 4 did you know articles, and 75 FAC and GAN reviews;
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,095 round points, largely from 3 featured articles, 6 good articles, and 5 did you know articles;
• MCE89 (submissions) with 848 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 32 FAC and GAN reviews; and
• Rollinginhisgrave (submissions) with 838 round points, largely from 1 featured article, 8 good articles, 1 did you know article, and 14 FAC, GAN, and peer reviews.

The full scores for round 1 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 7 featured articles, 16 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 168 good articles, 13 good-topic articles and more than 50 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 14 In the News articles, and they have conducted nearly 700 reviews. The tournament points table will be updated within the next few days.

Remember that any content promoted after 26 February but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

You reviewed the article Kesar Singh (film) previously but it has been moved back to draft again. I have made multiple changes and improved the quality of the article kindly check.🌟 𝒯𝐻𝐸 𝐵𝒪𝒮𝒮! 08:09, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

On 28 February 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Blanca Quiñónez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Blanca Quiñónez, the first player from South America in the history of UConn women's basketball, speaks the Molisan dialect alongside Spanish, English, and Italian? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Blanca Quiñónez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Blanca Quiñónez), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome JTtheOG! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 19:06, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

@Cielquiparle: Appreciate the reminder! JTtheOG (talk) 23:26, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for all your hard work. In a number of recent edits (about 9 I think) you have misspelt Encyclopedia as Encylopedia, that is, omitting the second C. These are all in articles that take the form 19xx in Libya. You can see them listed here. Would you mind correcting them please? I usually do it myself but I haven't come across so many in a batch before!

Thanks and all good wishes, DBaK (talk) 20:21, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Yes of course I can fix these tonight. Man do I hate mobile editing… JTtheOG (talk) 20:41, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Fantastic job, thank you so much! cheers DBaK (talk) 23:15, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, JTtheOG! Would you mind marking the article for European Commission v Hungary as reviewed so that the article appears in search engine results? The case easily exceeds the requirements of Wikipedia:Notability. Justthefacts (talk) 20:11, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

On 10 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charlie Marr, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Charlie Marr was paid by oil corporations to coach American football in Mexico? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charlie Marr. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charlie Marr), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:03, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello,

I saw you've reviewed many of the articles I created using the Historical Dictionary of Switzerland (HDS) (example). Thanks a lot for that!

There's actually many, many more that should be created, so I would like to get the help from some people from my non-profit OKA for it. However, because they receive a grant from OKA, they are considered paid editors and therefore can only publish articles through Articles for Creation (AfC).

Typically the AfC process works fine, but in this particular case I worry that AfC reviewers will just decline the articles because they will see they have a single source only (as they won't be familiar with HDS). So I think it could help if we had 1-2 people like yourself who could review the AfC articles related to HDS? If you agree, we could find some kind of mechanism (e.g., an on-wiki or off-wiki list) to track the HDS articles that need review.

Let me know what you think 7804j (talk) 07:43, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

@7804j: Hello, it's a pleasure to connect. I'd be glad to help out with that, even though I've never reviewed an article through the AfC process... JTtheOG (talk) 02:33, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG. I found your name at WP:MEX, and I see you have experience with new article creation - would you mind taking a look at a draft in my userspace (User:ValeNoggy/Agustín Coppel Luken) and moving it to mainspace if you think it's ready? Feel free to do any cleanup you feel is necessary. I'm not putting it in mainspace myself because I work for Grupo Coppel. Thanks! ValeNoggy (talk) 16:20, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

You missed the tag on this one! Silverseren^C 01:06, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you! JTtheOG (talk) 05:11, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello! Your submission of Ja'Deion High at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 12:04, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

Hola! Tras intentar neutralizar la página del Partido Republicano chileno, como parte de mi conocido trabajo sobre historia política de mi país, un usuario me llevó a WP:ANI y otros desviaron el tema para proponer mi sanción por uso de IA, siendo que lo reconozco en mi User Page al trabajarla de manera profesional para lo que fue la sacrificada tarea de cobertura parlamentaria 1932–2030. Asimismo, suelo ocuparla en Inglés por motivos de intentar una redacción más pulcra al no tener total dominio pese a sí tener entendimiento.

De verdad que no he tenido mala fe en nada. Solo he querido promover información de calidad en relación a lo que es Chile hacia exterior. No obstante, tengo algo de temor por lo que pueda ocurrir. Por lo mismo, me gustaría recibir orientación.

Muchas gracias de antemano. Te escribí en esta ocasión por que sé que has sido bueno, paciente y empático conmigo. Carigval.97 (talk) 02:34, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

@Carigval.97: Hola amigo, buenas. Disculpa que no tuve tiempo para entrar y leer la discusión. Espero que todo haya ido bien. Cual fue el resultado? JTtheOG (talk) 21:24, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

On 25 March 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ethan Sanchez, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ethan Sanchez was nearly named "Diego Maradona Sanchez" by his father, but his mother's anesthesia wore off in time for her to dismiss the idea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ethan Sanchez. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ethan Sanchez), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | April 2026, Vol 12, Issue 4, Nos 358, 359, 367, 368, 369 Online events: New: Countries starting with D, E and F | Women's Works: Written works | Cascading Women Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: CEE women Tip of the month: When creating a new article, take a moment to ensure any notable woman is redlinked. Someone might be inspired to create an article for her. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk) 20:15, 29 March 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I just know this is AI too: Continental Football League (2026) (at least the first diff before other people started editing it) I'm sure it's notable but I can't bring myself to patrol anything unless it's from a non-AI editor. People assume good faith way too much on this stuff. No has one any typos anymore except me. Also no one posts bare URLs as references anymore. Every ref is always just a title and an italicized publisher like at the Continental Football League (2026)#References. Newish editors didn't used to make these perfect articles. People used to make stubs. And I'm supposed to believe everyone is just doing this stuff by themselves? lol ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

@WikiOriginal-9: My bad, just seeing this now. Definitely AI. The "[1][2]" fake citations are always funny. I hate how much it sounds like corpo-speak slop, too. Corporate press releases and LLMs were made for eachother. JTtheOG (talk) 21:36, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

I started a similar thread here if you're interested. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 21:50, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Xavian Stapleton is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53 -- Jordano53 (talk) 20:37, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

On 5 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Ja'Deion High, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Ja'Deion High took time off from his job as a truck driver to represent the United States in flag football? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ja'Deion High. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Ja'Deion High), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi there! I wanted to let you know I have unmarked Republic of the Congo at the Paralympics, an article you recently patrolled, as reviewed. I clicked on both source links, and they came up empty. That is, they were the same link, which went to a search page with no results. If you disagree with this action or had a different experience, let me know. Sometimes links end up wonky. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:31, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Xavian Stapleton has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53 -- Jordano53 (talk) 22:26, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JTtheOG, I wanted to reach out because I took your feedback from April 5th to heart regarding my patrolling speed.

Because of your comment, I've significantly adjusted my work to prioritize the article's depth over the article's volume. I have slowed down my reviewing speed to only ~4 articles a minute: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Database_reports/Top_new_article_reviewers. And I’m trying to spend even more time on complex pages.

As someone who earned Reviewer of the Year in 2024 and 2025 for a reason, I’d value your honest take: do you still consider 4 a minute too fast for the types of articles I'm hitting? I’m trying to eliminate errors, and my reviews present to readers of Wikipedia as high-quality, not high-volume. Thanks for the guidance and for all the work you do for the project. CostalCal (talk) 07:52, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey @CostalCal:, that seems pretty reasonable to me. I generally hover somewhere around that rate too (1-4 a.p.m.), but like I said, there are certainly no set rules and there will be situations where you can bang some out in very quick succession, such as surnames, disambiguations, or very-obviously-notable two- or three-sentence stubs. However, 12 or 14 per minute does start wading into dangerous waters, and there is a lot one could potentially miss if they're consistently approaching those numbers. I'm glad to hear that you've slowed down a bit in order to better scrutinize each article. This will undoubtedly result in higher quality reviews, just as you've pointed out. Once again, thank you for putting a big dent in the unreviewed articles backlog. Your help is very much appreciated. JTtheOG (talk) 08:16, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, why did you remove the fv tags on Buhera North? I didn't see the name of the constituency anywhere in the source, unless I'm missing something. JTtheOG (talk) 08:20, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi @JTtheOG! I want to express my gratitude for your work reviewing the articles I created <3 I also have a question.

Since I create film articles that are usually about upcoming films or those only playing at festivals at the time the articles are created, I typically include only a Premise section that I paraphrase from reliable sources, rather than a full Plot summary. Recently, I noticed that someone copied and pasted the actual premise into one of the articles. In the back of my mind, I think that's not allowed. I'd like to ask if you remember the basis for this so I can undo the edit. From what I’ve read, the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film only addresses Plot Summary.

Thank you! Have a nice day. Semampunya (talk) 13:15, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Are you serious dude? the article was just made. Why are you ALREADY nominating it for deletion, and without a reason at that. Mass shootings are rare at tourist spots, and most of them are terrorism. This has already been reported on internationally and I'm sure will sustain coverage. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:42, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

@Bloxzge 025: If you cared to read the notice, an article was already created on the same topic. JTtheOG (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, but that should be a merge discussion instead. Bloxzge 025 (talk) 20:50, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

More information April 29: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce ...

April 29: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, with an online-based participation option also available. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! Featuring this salon, a facilitated discussion on Wikidata, notability, and GLAM! All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct and Photography Policy. Meeting info: Wednesday, April 29 WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce (optional RSVP on-wiki). 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (Open Hour) 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm (Wiki Salon) (Prime Produce, Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan) Also online via Zoom

Close

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:15, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Xavian Stapleton has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jordano53 -- Jordano53 (talk) 02:26, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 April 25 § Single-article non-resident ambassadors on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 08:00, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 April 25 § More redundant bilateral relations categories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 12:32, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

	The Real Life Barnstar
	Thanks for your steady contributions Himankshu (talk) 17:45, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

@Himankshu: Much appreciated! JTtheOG (talk) 22:45, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Would you stop diverting? Stately2 (talk) 01:54, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

@Stately2: No, an article has already been created on the topic. Please edit that instead. JTtheOG (talk) 02:19, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi, @JTtheOG

Thank you so much for reviewing my recent article and approving it. I have an article that has been on the review list for long (It's been more than a month) and no review yet. Maybe you can take a look.

Here: Elizabeth Shoyemi

Best. Obinna Tony (talk) 14:34, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG, as I've noticed that you reviewed Kerrice Brooks and Bella Shepard (thank you), I wondered if you could also review Draft:Karim Diané Someone else published it as a draft way back in 2021 and it was reviewed multiple times since, before the new Star Trek series even aired, and at this time, it was considered as not yet relevant enough. Now it seems to be stuck in a rejection limbo, even though the actor has gained international prominence for his performance as first gay Klingon in the Star Trek franchise and recently was anounced as an honoree by the Critics Choice Association. More on the article's Talk page. Re-review would be greatly appreciated. Tartigradesinspace (talk) 07:22, 27 April 2026 (UTC) Edit 2026-04-30: already re-reviewed, nothing to do. Tartigradesinspace (talk) 15:49, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 April 28 § Bilateral relations of Bahrain that contain only expatriate, emigrant, and descent subcategories on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:37, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

On 29 April 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Panama women's national flag football team, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Panama women's national flag football team won a gold medal after outscoring its opponents 349–7? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panama women's national flag football team. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Panama women's national flag football team), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

The second round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 28 April. As a reminder for contestants who just joined or are unaware of recent changes to our round-points system, good article nomination reviews now receive 10 points, an increase from 5 points in the previous year, as per a consensus at WT:CUP. Peer reviews, which continue to be worth 5 points, are now listed in the same section as featured article candidate reviews, rather than with good article reviews. Everyone who competed in round 2 will advance to round 3 unless they have withdrawn or been banned. No other changes to the round-point system have been made for this year.

Round 2 was competitive. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; nine scored over 500; and fourteen scored over 300. The top seven contestants had at least one featured article (two of them with two apiece). The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:

• MCE89 (submissions) with 1,333 points, mainly from good and featured articles about Australian people and geography
• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,169 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to shipping ethics controversy in fanfiction, waterways, and Gu Yanwu
• Bgsu98 (submissions) with 1,149 points, mainly from good articles, featured articles, and featured lists about figure skating, along with many article reviews and two good topics
• Olliefant (submissions) with 830 points, mainly from good and featured articles about television shows, episodes and media, along with nearly four dozen good and featured article reviews
• Gommeh (submissions) with 827 points, mainly from good and featured articles related to Genshin Impact and Honkai: Star Rail

The full scores for round 2 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 12 featured articles, 13 featured lists, 2 featured-topic articles, 106 good articles, 22 good-topic articles and more than 40 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 3 In the News articles, and they have conducted over 200 reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 April but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed in Round 3. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372 Online events: New: Countries starting with G and H | Women's scientific works | Religion and Spirituality Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Contest: Destubathon of the Americas Tip of the month: Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks, which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayny Balata, the article was kept despite no one actually citing any sources... I looked at all of the sources in the article myself and this was literally the best one. There was nothing else close to independent or SIGCOV. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:32, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

@WikiOriginal-9: Nope, nothing at all. I just put up a white flag and choose to respect Peaceray's additions to the article despite no actual SIGCOV getting added. I mean he claimed that Canada Soccer and the American Conference were independent sources lol. Plus, I had just been admonished for my apparent sexism at another AfD, so didn't wanna hurt this person's feelings any more. JTtheOG (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Closed by a non-admin too... JTtheOG (talk) 15:51, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

And don't forget that this bozo has all the proof they need to determine I'm racist too. JTtheOG (talk) 15:53, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

The result was keep. -.- ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 12:48, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Canada Soccer and the American Conference definitely aren't independent, lol. I think a deletion review may be in order. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 15:54, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

No consensus even though Peaceray is saying the ESPN database shows notability and that the college conference is indendepent. LOL. "ESPN is a reliable source. To discount the statistics about Balata on espn.com as a database is absurd." I don't think he knows what absurd means. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 22:20, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Omg. I unwatched the discussion page towards the end of last month cuz I though it was forsure headed towards a keep so I never saw any of this. That's insane. JTtheOG (talk) 23:05, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Here's another beauty of a quote: "theamerican.org is the website for the American Conference (NCAA) (formerly the Big East. As a multi-state, multi-sport (24 NCAA sports when part of the Big East) consortium of powerhouse sports universities, I suspect that Americans knowledgeable about collegiate sports would disagree with the assessment that they are not independent & would count the site as reliable." ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

I had not considered the subject played in a multi-state conference in college. Changing my !vote to Strong keep. JTtheOG (talk) 23:19, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

How about: Keep because These gymnasts usually start their competitive careers very early and have already achieved results. JTtheOG (talk) 02:25, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG, I have officially nominated you for the May 2026 Administrator Elections. Please stop by to accept the nomination and answer the candidate questions whenever you're ready! I hope I did the nomination correctly. CostalCal (talk) 04:21, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

@CostalCal I sincerely hope you didn't make a nomination page for somebody without speaking to them first. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:59, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

That did cross my mind, but I wasn't certain enough to actually say it here. @JT is a fantastic candidate... however something like an administrator nomination requires weeks or even months of prior communication beforehand. 11WB (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

@11WB ehhh, not necessarily. Some people have approached me and others in the very last day of AELECT and went for it. Some people do plan a while ahead and it benefits them greatly, while others have been ready for a while and say "screw it", and go for it. It's so very hard to generalize that sort of thing.

Now with all that said.... I'm quite confident JT would make a good admin, but it's very important that a nomination be made with their consent and not be a surprise. Hey man im josh (talk) 21:08, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

I meant to say 'usually requires weeks or even months'. A one week headstart would be risky in any event. 11WB (talk) 21:53, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

In addition to many highly experienced editors not being interested in adminship, the nominator is informally expected to be an admin or otherwise someone with more experience than the nominee. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 19:02, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

There are a number of non-admins who are highly respected who would make excellent nominators, but they're not usually interested in doing so. It's just that those who are most interested in helping others become admins are already admins. But I'd also argue some candidates I've nominated have had way more experience than me! I do get what you were trying to say though :) Hey man im josh (talk) 21:06, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

• Update: @JT has formally declined the nomination. This was clearly a good faith nomination from @CostalCal for a superb editor. I'm certain if @JT ever chooses to run, they would have no difficulty in finding nominators and support! 11WB (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

  Thanks, I appreciate you all. I'll consider it in the future. JTtheOG (talk) 23:50, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for reviewing the pages Sonakshi Batra and Rajat Verma. ITVStoryWeaver (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

I don't undestand the Elliot Cadeau warning.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

@TonyTheTiger: Please revisit your work to the article. JTtheOG (talk) 22:35, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I was recently granted new page reviewer permissions and I've been trying to work on the backlog drive for May 2026. However, I'm a little confused as to how the review process works. Since you seem to be very experienced with new page patrolling and Wikipedia in general, I wanted to ask you about when to mark a page as "reviewed". Should a page only be marked as reviewed if it doesn't warrant some sort of maintenance tag, or can you mark it as reviewed as long as you tag it for those issues? What is considered "not enough" for something to be reviewed, and if it doesn't meet standards what other routes can be taken for it?

For instance, take the page AMRO. It isn't reviewed, and a previous reviewer has left a talk page notification that says it needs more established notability. Should I tage it as such and mark it reviewed, or what? Thanks, DoO2 02:33, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

@Dog Oxide: Hi there. Usually it comes down to notability. Looking at the content and the sources will give you a good idea of its notability, and you'll eventually get better at identifying what types of articles are easy WP:GNG/WP:SNG passes.

The second source in the AMRO article is a multiple-page article in an academic journal, so that's a very good start. There is also this paper, which is even longer. I'd say you can confidently review that one since it's covered in-depth in multiple independent sources. Just tag it with "more citations" needed (all the leaders aren't sourced) and check for copyvio. JTtheOG (talk) 02:44, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

And you can definitely mark as reviewed while tagging, but wait an hour before tagging articles up, and try not to add more than two or three. If an article is of questionable notability, it never hurts to send it to AfD. JTtheOG (talk) 02:54, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Great, thanks so much for the quick, concise, and non-bitey reply! Is there a way to install that copyvio detector as a plugin? It seems really handy! Thanks, DoO2 03:11, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

No problem. And not that I know of, no. JTtheOG (talk) 03:21, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Huh, someone should really make that. Also, one more thing: is there a good tool to use for checking LLM-usage? I've been pretty paranoid recently about AI usage in writing new articles given its prevalence, and I'm just wondering what you do for that. DoO2 03:22, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

I put some links on Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026. I think of the clearest/most common signs is WP:OVERATTRIBUTION. It sounds unnatural to constantly say where information came from when it's supposedly already said in the source attached to it. The Undetectable.ai website is good sometimes but not too reliable. JTtheOG (talk) 03:27, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

@Dog Oxide For a quicker way to get to a copyvio check, you can install User:Novem Linguae/Scripts/NPPLinks. That gives you, among other things, a Copyvio check link in the left hand pane. Cheers, SunloungerFrog (talk) 05:46, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Sweet, thanks! DoO2 00:46, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi there. We've both draftified some of this series of articles that have been created for lacking sources. The original author has been moving them back basically unaltered. Do we have a plan going forward? It's a hell of a lot of work to search for sources for someone who doesn't want to do it themselves. Boynamedsue (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

@Boynamedsue: If they move it back, you can just send it to AfD and mention that the article creator immediately moved the draftified article back to mainspace. A before search doesn't have to be comprehensive, especially when the creator isn't being bothered to look for any sourcing and is disruptively moving the pages back.

Scroll through a couple Google search results and maybe try a few different languages, while ignoring primary sources like the WAKO or national federations. The few independent sources will probably not contain in-depth coverage, but you can include the beefiest sources in your AfD nomination.

I like to add something like "-instagram.com -facebook.com -tiktok.com -YouTube.com -x.com -twitter.com -reddit.com -pinterest.com -linkedin.com -threads.com" to my google searches to filter out all the annoying social media links. You can add wako.sport to that too. JTtheOG (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll give that a go.Boynamedsue (talk) 18:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey @JTtheOG

I am just messaging you about checking over an article I expanded from a simple redirect to an actual article.

It is for the Dubois County Bombers. It originally redirected to League Stadium but I decided to finish my project of getting all active Prospect League team’s a page.

Does it look good (note: still pulling together info from their Ohio Valley League seasons since that is hard to find). ParkerLyme (talk) 22:06, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Looks great, nice work! JTtheOG (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

Ouch, you missed out on the reviewing of this... I was hoping it was you... last list article for the moment. ~ JASWE (talk) 06:59, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

		The New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		Hi JTtheOG! I just wanted to say thanks for reviewing some of my pages that I made about plant stubs (I just noticed the drive a couple days ago). Nice work, and good luck with the drive! GamerMatthew276 (talk) 15:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

@GamerMatthew276: Appreciate it! JTtheOG (talk) 05:25, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

(Starting off by saying that I appreciate, truly, your doing AI cleanup work.)

Just wanted to let you know that there are people who are warning that they will remove any AI-generated templates from articles if there are not also parallel discussions started on the talk page, so unfortunately, it looks like you have to tag articles in two places now. I'm going down the list and doing this for past tags so they don't get drive-by deleted. Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up and for all your talk page notices. JTtheOG (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

		The New Page Reviewer's Gold Award
		JTtheOG, thank you so much for the speedy review of all my Poland-related rail transport articles on railway stations for all these months! --Fortek67 (talk) 08:00, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

@Fortek67: Much appreciated! Nice work. JTtheOG (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Category:Municipal presidents of Querétaro has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mclay1 (talk) 07:29, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the Lola Tórtola article! I appreciate your help.

AdriSoft (talk) 21:11, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@AdriSoft: Thank you! JTtheOG (talk) 23:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing my article RV Soela, it is appreciated! Tony 1212 (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, JTtheOG, and thanks for your tremendous efforts in connection with page reviews. At the moment, I'm faced with a pretty sticky problem. While I am by no means a proponent of articles created by family or close contacts, I was recently asked by the creator and father of Kai Vetch (see my talk page) to assess its rating. After looking through the article and taking into account the assessments by Ores and Rater, I promoted the article to B class. I have now been informed that the article has been deleted and see that this was on the basis of insufficient valid citations and poor prose. Without some kind of support, it appears to me that further attempts at recreating article will again lead to deletion. I also wonder whether it is perhaps premature to write an article about someone who has participated only in the 2026 Ginetta Junior Championship but am not sufficiently familiar with any rules relating to motor sports. I see however that none of the other participants have biographies. If this is the case, then the "too soon" conclusion of the deleting reviewer may indeed be justified. Nevertheless, the article seems to me to have sufficient valid citations and I could find no major faults with the prose. I would therefore appreciate any advice you could could provide in this connection. In particular, it would be useful to have some suggestions from you on how to respond to the article's creator.--Ipigott (talk) 11:23, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

I see that Road Atlanta Turn 5 is making a serious attempt at improving the draft. It therefore looks as if it will be moved back to mainspace soon.--Ipigott (talk) 08:54, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

@Ipigott: Hello, I appreciate your attention to this matter. I must preface by saying that I am by no means an expert on motorsports. I have noticed that many auto racing bios of questionable notability have been expanded to impressive lengths, possibly due to the many different competitions that racers participate in. However, I also know that Road Atlanta Turn 5 is one of our best editors in the auto racing project. While I have no comment on the subject's notability yet, I am certainly glad that someone with this experience can clean up the article, since I'm not comfortable with articles created by family either. Thank you for all you do! JTtheOG (talk) 18:26, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to admit I made a mistake by copying and pasting a lot of the original text with little to no changes. I didn't know this was forbidden in Wikipedia and it's the first time I come accross that rule.

Should I move the article to a draft? Miiversal (talk) 22:58, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

More information May 27: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce ...

May 27: WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our WikiWednesday Salon at Prime Produce in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, with an online-based participation option also available. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome! Featuring this salon, a presentation on on whether Wikipedia can replace law school. And also, a facilitated group discussion on the proper place of AI in the wiki-verse. All attendees are subject to Wikimedia NYC's Code of Conduct and Photography Policy. Meeting info: Wednesday, May 27 WikiWednesday @ Prime Produce (optional RSVP on-wiki). 6:00 pm – 7:00 pm (Open Hour) 7:00 pm – 9:00 pm (Wiki Salon) (Prime Produce, Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan) Also online via Zoom

Close

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Bulgaria–Madagascar relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive
June 2026 Backlog Drive: Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process? On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed. Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points! Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talk page.
You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375 Online events: New: LGBTQ+ women | Alphabet run: Countries starting with I, J, K and L Article improvement campaign: Orphaned women Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements, tips, participation... Announcements from other communities: Eiffel women Tip of the month: Consider contributing to two of our monthly events at once, and improve coverage of LGBTQ+ women by de-orphaning their articles. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram & Pinterest

--Rosiestep (talk) 22:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hello JTtheOG. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Yemoh Ike, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The subject in question has produced a film that was screened at Cannes. This is enough to not be eligible for A7. Thank you. BangJan1999 16:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

@BangJan1999: Understandable but unfortunate, seems like a COI issue. JTtheOG (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guy Sasson, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Category:Argentina–Jamaica relations indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:44, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG. Thank you for your suggestions to improve notability for 2011–12 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season and 2012–13 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season. I am working on a project to record the previous football campaigns since women's football turned professional in 2010. I have been working backwards from the current 2025-26 campaign. I understand why these seasons were not ready for going live and I have now begun making amendments. The previous campaign seasons are part of the Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. department which has increasing notability as a club but understand as this gets further back there is less famililarity. APDHistorian (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

@APDHistorian: Hello! That's a very noble project indeed, but the articles you publish must contain independent coverage from WP:RS, just like any other page. The articles were only sourced to the FA and club website (non-independent) and a blog (not reliable). Cheers! JTtheOG (talk) 20:36, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I totally agree with the WP:RS but I find it a little sexist that there can be articles for men's teams going back over 100 years but for the women's teams it is harder to gain relevance. All I am trying to do is collect historical sources for the women's team to put them on equal parity to the men's team. What is so different that allows this to remain 2012–13 Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. season but 2012–13 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season is not permitted? APDHistorian (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

@APDHistorian: I find it a little disrespectful and dismissive to refer to my actions as sexist. I'm a new page reviewer, and I came across an article (regardless of the subject) that had zero independent coverage, so I draftified it to allow you (or anyone) to continue improving the sourcing until it's ready for publishing. The difference is that that other article was created in 2012, predating my time on Wikipedia, and I was not the person who marked it as reviewed (although they were justified, since an EFL Championship season gets more coverage than probably most first-tier leagues around the world).

Second, these cases are just not comparable, other than the name on the front of the jersey. I could be 100% wrong, but I have doubts the women's side had an average home attendance of 26,000, or the same amount of TV viewers every week, or (most importantly in our case), the same amount of newspaper coverage being written about them. As you mentioned, these were the early stages. They also played in the English third tier, while the men's team played in the second tier. That's not to say they don't deserve the same attention, respect, or salary than their male counterparts. They put in just as much work and sacrifice, and possibly even more when considering other societal factors. But unfortunately, sports remains one of the most sexist industries there is, and men's pro sports in particular have been pushed, marketed, and invested in for over a century.

Many editors like myself are committed to improving coverage on women's biographies through WP:WIRED, which organizes monthly and yearly initiatives to tackle our site's content gap, where just over 20% of biographies are about women. However, what we cannot do is lower the existing standards to try to correct this clear injustice. Wikipedia articles reflect the amount of coverage that exists on a given subject, not the amount we would like to exist. Instead, we should try to focus on creating robustly sourced articles on women subjects, which we all know they deserve. Once again, I commend your project and wish you the best of luck going forward. I have no doubt these articles have a tremendous amount of untapped potential. There very well might be a swath of independent coverage about either or both of these seasons.

A great resource that I can recommend is the WP:LIBRARY, which gives you access to many, many sites such as Newspapers.com and NewspaperArchive (although your account needs to be a few months old). I see that 2001–02 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season already has a few independent sources, so that's a great start. Happy editing, and let me know if you have further questions. JTtheOG (talk) 21:48, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Apologies, I didn't mean to infer your actions were sexist, you're just doing your best to infer the rules which I agree with otherwise anything would end up published. I was just commenting on general unconscious bias which is something I think everyone can be guilty of unintentionally. My reasons for improving resources and articles on Wikipedia was that I want more people that want to learn about the women's team. I personally have a distrust of AI and value that Wikipedia is force of good to tackle this and I'm 100% committed to providing accurate sources. APDHistorian (talk) 22:14, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

@APDHistorian: No worries. I understand your point. We are certainly vulnerable to these biases. I also have deeply negative attitudes on AI, which represents an existential threat to Wikipedia. Thank you for your commitment to your values. JTtheOG (talk) 22:44, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I have spent some time on Draft:2012–13 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season and I believe it is now ready. I haven't started on 2011-12 yet. I also might wait until I have 500 edits so I can try to use WP:Library to track down even older articles as the articles from 2001 are very hard to find. APDHistorian (talk) 00:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the FA would not be considered an independent source. JTtheOG (talk) 00:44, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Other women's pages like 2011-12 FA Women's CUP cite the football association alone because it's a neutral governing body, so I struggle to understand your point how the FA isn't considered independent? Surely news articles are less reliable than a neutral governing body because news articles like BBC News would often cite the relevant governing body. APDHistorian (talk) 11:16, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for the newspaper resources. I will look into it as I do value accurate sources. How long do draftspace articles take to be reviewed by the way? Does it go to another reviewer and not back to you? APDHistorian (talk) 22:37, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

Just shoot me message and I should be able to help you move it back. JTtheOG (talk) 22:47, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I have added sources for Draft:2012–13 Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. season to the relevant independent governing bodies of the football association and Sussex Football Association documents. I also wish to point out that the wiki article 2011-12 FA Women's Cup citations are solely from the football association. APDHistorian (talk) 11:22, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out. I have tagged that page as overly reliant on primary sources. Brighton & Hove Albion is not independent from the FA because it is a member club of said organization, so they have a direct relationship.

The General notability guideline says: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. JTtheOG (talk) 21:21, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

While official governing body statistics systems are fully permitted under WP:PRIMARY to verify non-controversial factual data like scorelines and match dates, I have updated the references to resolve your concerns. The draft now integrates independent, third-party regional journalistic sources, including local sports coverage from seagulls.co.uk, to provide robust secondary verification (WP:SECONDARY) for the 2012–13 fixtures and management structure. I wish to remind you it is common practice to reference the football governing body for results as the 2012–13 FA Women's Premier League article has done so. APDHistorian (talk) 20:29, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Is seagulls.co.uk not the club's website? JTtheOG (talk) 06:15, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

On 1 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Shiyazh Pete, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Shiyazh Pete is the first player from the Navajo Nation to sign with a National Football League team? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Shiyazh Pete. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Shiyazh Pete), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

HurricaneZeta^C 00:02, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Mule Dowell is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WikiOriginal-9 -- WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:05, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Category:Mexico–Saint Kitts and Nevis relations has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:46, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Mule Dowell has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of WikiOriginal-9 -- WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 22:24, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Moses Shipi, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Chair of a political party notable enough to have its own article is a credible enough claim to notability for A7. Take it to AfD if required. Thank you. GedUK  08:47, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm messaging you after seeing this message. All articles created by AMurmu were in fact generated using an LLM. Next time if you are suspicious of LLM content, such as when patrolling new articles, please report to the AI noticeboard, it would be very helpful of you. Thank you. Fortek67 (talk) 00:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello JTtheOG. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of My Toilet Is Clogged, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: As bizarre as it sounds, this is a real thing. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Silvia Contreras is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 22:06, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

On 8 June 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Anton Bonke, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that basketball player Anton Bonke represented his home nation, Vanuatu, in rowing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Anton Bonke. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Anton Bonke), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Silvia Contreras has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Morogris -- Morogris (talk) 00:26, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

You are invited to participate in Wiki Loves Fútbol! We're running it during the 2026 World Cup, starting now until July 19. Help us edit pages on everything futbol: think national teams from across Latin America, players, host cities, and the stuff around the cup that usually gets short shrift, like the immigration and culture angles. We're working in both English and Spanish.

Here's the fun part: it's set up like a Panini sticker album. You collect stamps for different kinds of contributions: editing an article, adding a photo over on Wikimedia Commons, doing a translation, or starting a Wikidata item. Fill the album first to win $200. That’s not all: we are also giving out $25 prizes to the “Player of the Match” every week the contest runs. You don't have to be a power editor to play. Everyone is welcome!

If you're a little curious, come take a look at our target articles. Do you think we are missing some good articles? We are open to suggestions! The best place to actually get going is our WikiLatinos Discord, that's where the article missions will live, where the leaderboard is, and where someone can point you to a good first edit if you want one.

Hope you'll jump in. Oscar_. (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi JTtheOG, Just wanted to let you know that yesterday I was granted autopatrolled user rights. This means that from now on I won't be spamming you with new soft redirect pages anymore. Thanks again you for hard work. Regards, Mill 1 (talk) 07:53, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

No worries. Best of luck on your projects! JTtheOG (talk) 19:34, 12 June 2026 (UTC)