User talk:EditorInHK

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, website, or role, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

1. Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
2. Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
3. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
4. Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. If you are having trouble, you may want to try using the unblock wizard.

Before requesting a new username, check if it is still available. If the search says "There is no global account for [username]", the username is free to use.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the edit. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 16:20, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

I am a paid representative/marketing agency for Danny Khursigara; submitting draft for review.

I am a paid marketing agency for Danny Khursigara; submitting draft for review. GoldFlowMarketing (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

EditorInHK (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Requested username:

EditorInHK (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I intent to share non-promotional information that are up-to-date and useful to the world on Wikipedia, including creating a page for a celebrity in Hong Kong, Danny Khursigara. I also disclosed the paid-contribution between my agency and Danny Khursigara and will follow all the rules here in Wikipedia. GoldFlowMarketing (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Accept reason:

I have renamed you. Since the only thing you did was disclose as a paid editor, I will remove the block. I will caution you that writing about your client is actually not easily accomplished. Writing a new article is the most difficult task to perform on Wikipedia even without a conflict of interest, it's even harder with one. Wikipedia is not interested in what they want to say about themselves; a Wikipedia article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the subject, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of notability- such as a notable person.(there are also narrower criteria for certain fields like musicians). As a paid editor, it's up to you to figure out how things work here. We'll answer your questions, but we won't handhold you.
Please read WP:BOSS and why an article is not necessarily desirable, and show them to your client. 331dot (talk) 21:27, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

• Jauerback Any particular reason for the hardblock? 331dot (talk) 19:21, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

  I have no problem if you unblock or change it to a softblock. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Draft:Danny Khursigara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 13:56, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for message

You have an obvious conflict of interest, please read the guidance below:

• When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

• Most of your refs are unacceptable. They include his own website, pages of organisations he is associated with, interviews with him and other sites that are not independent third-party sources. You also have junk refs like YouTube, Amazon, IMDB and press releases. two of the refs for awards don't appear to mention him as a recipient.
• It's difficult to see how he meets the notability criteria listed above. Even if we accept what you claim, he has a company, he's written a couple of books and he's claimed to have some awards that are not properly verified by ref to the warding body that actually mention him.
• Publications written by him should be listed as such, in a separate section if preferred, with no references for the items. They should not be used as references either, since by definition they are not independent third-party sources as required here.

• You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

• It's all what he says about himself. We don't want to know that. An example or two His coaching methodology centres on what he describes as consciousness-based transformational leadership — how higher consciousness exemplifies success in the corporate and business world. Helping executives identify and transcend limiting belief systems at a subconscious level in order to achieve measurable improvements in both professional performance and personal wellbeing. self-sourced self-promotion He works with clients across the financial services, luxury fashion, and hospitality sectors, among others... Khursigara has received testimonials from notable senior executives at major global organisations. Notable clients include... source, of course is his own website, rather than the claimed client's pages.

• There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
• You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

• I didn't check.

• You had no wikilinks, and your headings were in sentence case.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 11:15, 14 March 2026 (UTC)