User talk:Grechkovsky

Hi Grechkovsky! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 07:56, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use your sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Please write humor pages in the Wikipedia namespace. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 01:48, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Grechkovsky (talk) 03:16, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

I'll make sure to be more careful next time about where I publish stuff I guess. Also is my last reply visible? I can't see it. Grechkovsky (talk) 03:45, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

The redirect Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 31 § Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky until a consensus is reached. 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 02:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)' — 💽 🌙Eclipse 💽 🌹 ⚧ (she/they) ^talk/edits 02:05, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ca ^{talk to me!} 14:40, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. BusterD (talk) 15:11, 31 January 2025 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Wedding campaign of Tymofiy Khmelnytsky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ca ^{talk to me!} 05:09, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Do You Use Discord? LGT55 (talk) 13:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi Grechkovsky. Thank you for your work on Malorossian Cossacks. Another editor, User:Rodney Baggins has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and has left a comment on the Talk page. To reply, leave a comment here (or there) and begin it with {{Re|Rodney Baggins}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Editors note: This was done on the Soviet-Afghan War page, see talk page. Noorullah (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

G’day Grechkovsky, I noticed that you have been changing results on Bosnian War battle articles, and in some cases have referred to WP:RESULT. That guidance is very dubious and unhelpful, and the consensus for the wording currently in it is extremely weak. It is, frankly, counter-intuitive. It is far more useful for the reader to see a succinct outcome in plain language than trying o shoe-horn a unique military outcome into a choice of three possible outcomes. Please do not make such changes unless you have achieved consensus for it on the talk page of the relevant article. Especially in this area, which is controversial and where such behaviour can be considered disruptive. Feel free to respond here if you wish to do so, as I will watch list this page for a week. All the best, and enjoy editing Wikipedia. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:28, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Wouldn't it be more appropriate to comply to the guideline, and if the outcome is unclear or controversial to put see result or see aftermath, so readers can read about the result in detail in the section of the article devoted to it? Grechkovsky (talk) 15:59, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

No. The infobox should summarise the article, its content should be led by what is in the article, not some dubious template guideline with a very weak consensus that doesn’t help the reader. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:55, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Grechkovsky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Crimean Campaign 1711, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:07, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Grechkovsky. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Crimean Campaign 1711".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 22:24, 13 November 2025 (UTC)