User talk:Greenpark79

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Brian Barron. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 16:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC) Hi Robby, thanks for the heads up. I'll be sure not to reference it in future. Best, Greenpark79.Greenpark79 (talk) 17:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sir Derek Bibby requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.ifb.org.uk/media/4004/bibby-line-group-web.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 15:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Greenpark79. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Pool (magazine), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:The Pool (UK) logo (UK Women's Magazine).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --Min☠︎rax^«¦talk¦» 09:42, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm using it in a draft and waiting for its review. Greenpark79 (talk) 07:46, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi there! I see you have added some new references to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation article. Could you please the format of references 112-119? Thanks, and happy editing! GoingBatty (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

Your comment, in a discussion from the early 2000's, needs to be placed in date order on the Talk page and not in the present position. Regards, David J Johnson (talk) 13:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi David,

Thanks for the mention and placement. I'll note that from now on.

Please note that decades are plural and as such no apostrophe is required.

Regards,

Greenpark79 Greenpark79 (talk) 23:20, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Pilger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Bulletin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your work at Draft:The Pool (magazine). I will accept it soon. But please do not quote a lot as you did there. I would be fair if you summarise the quotations rather than copying them from the sources. Hope that helps! ToadetteEdit (talk) 16:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi Greenpark79! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Morrissey and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. BlueboyLINY (talk) 21:48, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi Greenpark79. Thank you for your work on George Lynch (journalist). Another editor, Relativity, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

You can move the links from the "Academic impact" section and use them as actual sources in the article, using information from them—it may help the chances of this being accepted. I hope this makes sense.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Relativity}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

‍Relativity ⚡️ 20:04, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Charlie Bigham's, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:24, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to BBC Brand. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It is a list of corporate design projects sourced mainly to primary sources and corporate blogs, not reliable independent sources. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Helpful Raccoon (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Midshot of the actor Tom Bennett.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Zack Polanski, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:05, 27 February 2026 (UTC)