User talk:HamadInternal

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Renzo Testolin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forza Italia. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Valle d'Aosta DOC, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alpine and Nus.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Bangladeshi diaspora, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:04, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Insaniyat Biplob Bangladesh, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Gulshanadded.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello,

I am reaching out regarding your recent edits to the Aslam Chowdhury article. I noticed a consistent pattern where information is being introduced from media sources with documented ties to **Jamaat-e-Islami**.

As this is a **Biography of a Living Person**, Wikipedia requires us to maintain a strict **Neutral Point of View** by using independent, third-party sources. Relying on partisan outlets for a political biography risks appearing as advocacy rather than encyclopedic reporting.

When an editor’s history shows a concentrated focus on a specific political narrative through selective sourcing, it can lead to a formal community review of their contributions on the **Conflict of Interest Noticeboard** to ensure compliance with our site-wide policies. Such a review involves a closer look at an account's edit logs and sourcing patterns to ensure the project's integrity is being upheld.

I sincerely believe your efforts would be better spent on articles where there isn't a perceived conflict of interest or a risk of partisan bias. I’d appreciate it if we could move forward by prioritizing mainstream, independent sources instead.

Best regards,

--CoopyBearreaux (talk) CoopyBearreaux (talk) 22:56, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, although i did provided WP:RELY for the claim that i made, which you removed without explanation. Nonetheless, follow WP:P&G before making any changes of that sort. HamadInternal (talk) 10:40, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, it seems like you are using a WP:LLM to write this comment. So, please refrain from using that too. HamadInternal (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Nope, no LLM was used to write these comments. Please follow wiki guidelines before pushing biased media sources into Wikipedia. In the article you cited it clearly said the EC suspended results due to pending unresolved civil suits but you misled readers by citing misconduct that was nowhere to be found. Your edit history indicates a clear alignment with Jamat-e-Islami sources. CoopyBearreaux (talk) 12:16, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

What does one considers a "Jamaat-e-islami source"!? I added the citation from Dhaka Tribune which outsourced it from BSS, both are labeled in WP:RSN as reliable. Also, for the LLM concerns, there's a long list in your talk page alone where you yourself admitted to have used LLM more than once. Further violation will be discussed on WP:AINB. Thanks. HamadInternal (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Me talking about a different place where I used LLM for restructuring doesn't mean I have used it on the topics I'm talking to you about. I can see LLM being used by you alongside thousands of mobile edits but I kept that aside. You cited DT which outsourced it from BSS and there's no source link at BSS. There's no mention regrading misconduct on any EC notices that you generated from thin air. You are constantly editing and drafting articles that show a paper trail leading to Jamat allies. We can open up a conflict of interest discussion if you want me to investigate it further? CoopyBearreaux (talk) 18:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Respectfully, You need to learn a lot about editing in this encyclopedia if you think "constantly editing and drafting" is somehow related to me not following WP:NPOV. Also, the comment you replied with, is filled with LLM characteristics.
No offense, But given your 10 days of editing experience here, i would suggest you to be thorough regarding your editing. I'm always here if you need a helping hand, cheers. HamadInternal (talk) 20:08, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, I look forward to learning from 4 month old accounts. Keeping that aside, please don't keep wasting people's time with unsolicited advice. Your issue was clearly stated and it would be helpful if you don't drag it around with unproductive derailing. You intentionally entered 'misconduct' a couple times before you were called out, and it clearly shows the coi as you went from editing Italian articles to Islamist alliances in Bangladesh post-election. Anyway, peace, just don't waste people's time with unnecessary fuss. Thanks. CoopyBearreaux (talk) 01:52, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

It seems like you have a WP:EQ problem. I think you should work on that first. Cheers. HamadInternal (talk) 16:49, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I am merely a reflection of your 4 month old bot account, bud. CoopyBearreaux (talk) 18:58, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Whatever floats your boat i guess. Again, if you need any help with the editing, i'm always here. Cheers. HamadInternal (talk) 19:17, 24 February 2026 (UTC)