User talk:Headbomb

Hi, thanks again for your third opinion! I reread your comment at Talk:British Journal of American Legal Studies, and I realize I have no idea what you actually meant. You wrote "what you want" is for the article to be better, and that "I wish this article was more in depth". I pretty explicitly am not seeking that (although of course I want all Wikipedia articles to be better), so I think I must have misunderstood your comment. Can you clarify? Suriname0 (talk) 00:26, 20 March 2026 (UTC)

@Headbomb: gently reupping this question. Thanks, Suriname0 (talk) 23:55, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Just letting you know that Citation bot introduced math errors in two titles in this edit. I`ll see if I can fix the code. Redalert2fan (talk) 14:35, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Sure, in the meantime, I fixed them. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 14:54, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Code fixed as well. Redalert2fan (talk) 13:59, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

There seems to be an issue with the ISSN template and you answered several earlier requests on there - could you please have a look at this discussion: Template talk:ISSN#ISSN Portal vs WorldCat? --Marsupilami04 (talk) 21:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

for many reasons. ~2026-19458-48 (talk) 03:36, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

@Headbomb - thanks for your work on the three HIMS related drafts. As an update from my side, I'm not comfortable with either the drafts' text, which are clearly LLM assisted, nor the fundamental neutrality of where this was heading, so I have declined all three for now. I can't find a Speedy basis, however! ChrysGalley (talk) 07:48, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

The main issue I have is I'm no subject matter expert, and like you said, those are clearly LLM-assisted articles, which seem to be designed to be very wordy and technical for some unknown reason. WP:Aviation might be of some help. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 12:33, 10 April 2026 (UTC)