User talk:Hellorld4

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is Hellorld4's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tropical Storm Dumako has been accepted

Tropical Storm Dumako, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 23:48, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hello Hellorld4! The thread you created at the Teahouse, What is meaning of Original research according to Wikipedia policy, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft rejection

I understand that rejection can be disappointing, but please don’t take it personally. The references in the draft primarily focus on Aircel as a company, and currently, the article lacks significant coverage in independent sources. You can improve it by adding stronger references and resubmit it for review. Another reviewer will take a look, and I’d be happy to assist if needed.

I also noticed that you have 29 edits so far, which suggests you are still in the learning phase. That’s completely fine—everyone starts somewhere! If you need any guidance, I’m happy to help. If you were fully familiar with Wikipedia's notability guidelines, you might have considered creating the article directly in the main space. But no worries, improving the draft and resubmitting is always an option. Let me know if you need any support! Rahmatula786 (talk) 04:08, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinnakannan Sivasankaran (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gheus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinnakannan Sivasankaran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gheus (talk) 16:52, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chinnakannan Sivasankaran (March 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chinnakannan Sivasankaran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 03:00, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

@RangersRus: hey, there are enough reliable sources to establish notability Hellorld4 (talk) 00:00, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles