Wikiwand AI

User talk:HistorySnob94

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriel H. Azuola (May 18)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Nil NZ, left the following feedback:
This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

or multiple published secondary sources that:

  • provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
  • are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
  • are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.
This is the English Wikipedia and we can only accept articles written in the English language. If you prefer to write in your own language, look for the Wikipedia project in your language on the Wikipedia home page.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Gabriel H. Azuola to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

nil nz 22:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, HistorySnob94! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nil nz 22:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, HistorySnob94, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Spanish; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Spanish? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. nil nz 22:57, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

¡Bienvenido(a)!

¡Hola HistorySnob94, bienvenido(a) a Wikipedia! Si bien todos los esfuerzos para mejorar la Wikipedia son bien recibidos, desdichadamente su nivel de inglés no parece idóneo para hacer contribuciones de utilidad, o las contribuciones no están escritas en inglés. ¿Sabía que existe una Wikipedia en español? Quizás usted prefiera contribuir ahí. De cualquiera forma, reciba la más cordial bienvenido(a) a Wikipedia y nuestro agradecimiento por esforzarse. Si necesita ayuda, puede notificármelo en mi página de discusión. nil nz 22:57, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gabriel H. Azuola (June 21)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, Helpful Raccoon, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.
Vague and superficial analysis such as He has participated in academic and institutional conferences in Colombia and the United Kingdom, as well as in historical dissemination programs and specialized publications is characteristic of LLM usage; ideally you should remove all prose from the draft and start over from a blank slate without LLMs.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Gabriel H. Azuola to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

Helpful Raccoon (talk) 05:56, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks