User talk:Hssstrt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sockpuppet

Information icon Editor Hssstrt, I have reason to believe that you are editing as a WP:SOCKPUPPET of editor Deusestlux. This matter will now be referred to higher authorities on WP for investigation. If your IPs match, there will be issues for you. 14.2.205.131 (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

March 2025

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Johnedwe. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 17:41, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Hello, I'm Someone who's wrong on the internet. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to British Black music have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 19:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at British Black music. Belbury (talk) 19:07, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

I gave a valid reason and added musicans Hssstrt (talk) 19:08, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Blocked


I haven’t help Hssstrt (talk) 19:13, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hssstrt (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Your reason here apology for actions leading to ban

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to apologise i understand what i did Hssstrt (talk) 19:14, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

cross icon
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hssstrt (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log) • SI)


Request reason:

Your reason here I apologise and understand what I have done

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. You'll need to explain to admins what you did and why, and why we should trust that it won't happen again. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 20:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I apologise for stockpuppeting and will not do it again Hssstrt (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

This doesn't come remotely close to explaining what you did. One sockpuppet, sure. 16? And acting blatantly abusively? You'll need to be much more convincing than this. --Yamla (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
How? Hssstrt (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
And some of the allegations weren’t true Hssstrt (talk) 19:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
How is up to you. WP:GAB has some suggestions. --Yamla (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI