User talk:Hzh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
/Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7 /Archive 8 /Archive 9 /Archive 10 /Archive 11 /Archive 12 /Archive 13
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Hzh. |
New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive
| January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
January 2025
Hello, I'm FoxtAl. I noticed that you recently removed content from Huddersfield sex abuse ring without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. FoxtAl (talk) 10:53, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
| Six years! |
|---|
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:31, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive
| May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Contentious topic alert
You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TarnishedPathtalk 10:22, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Contentious topic alert
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. TarnishedPathtalk 10:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- Are you done with that, or do you feel the need to do this endlessly? I haven't edited anything on that article, BTW, or do you think simply discussing the content is worth templating? Hzh (talk) 11:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- The CTOPs extend to the discussion pages. TarnishedPathtalk 11:14, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Notice of incident noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is to inform you that you are currently involved in a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding concerns about repeated reverts and content removals, as well as potential gatekeeping behavior—including dismissing valid sources, shutting down talk page discussions, and discouraging collaborative editing. The discussion focuses on whether these actions align with Wikipedia's policies on neutrality, verifiability, and consensus-building. Amrflh00 (talk) 05:48, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is to inform you that you have been named in an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, regarding possible violations of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring.
This involves repeated reverts/removals of properly sourced content, persistent gatekeeping, and shutting down discussion on article talk pages without working toward consensus. The concern raised is not just about reverts, but a pattern of behavior that may undermine collaborative editing and neutrality.
You are encouraged to respond and present your side of the situation, including your rationale and engagement efforts. Editors are expected to avoid disruptive editing and seek consensus, especially when multiple reliable sources are involved. Thank you. Amrflh00 (talk) 05:51, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive
| September 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
| |
| You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
Happy First Edit Day!
| Happy First Edit Day! Hi Hzh! On behalf of the Birthday Committee, I'd like to wish you a very happy anniversary of the day you made your first edit and became a Wikipedian! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 03:09, 29 August 2025 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for October 14
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Davis Miller, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Deer Lake.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Appreciate your quick review on Amate, Belagavi
thanks for reviewing Amate, Belagavi appreciate the quick response! Bech07 (talk) 14:55, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Articles for inhabited places are generally considered notable, therefore easy to pass. Just a note that the population figures given in the sources are different, therefore you should give a clear indication of where the number comes from (e.g. which census it comes from). The last reference is also not accessible, and a source for the Geography section should be added. Hzh (talk) 18:17, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive
| January–February 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | |
|
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.
| |
| You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jiuli tribe, a link pointing to the disambiguation page BC was added.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2026 (UTC)
CS1 error on History of Tottenham Hotspur F.C.
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page History of Tottenham Hotspur F.C., may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:10, 11 February 2026 (UTC)
Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Women
I intend to create a page on Tottenham Hotspur Women’s academy but only Arsenal W.F.C. and Manchester City W.F.C. of the WSL teams seem to have one. Comments, including objections, are welcome. LenF54 (talk) 18:02, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- I don't really pay much attention to the women's academy, so I have no idea if there are good enough sources for such an article. Frankly I don't think the sources for Arsenal and Manchester City WFC Academy articles are great, I suspect the one for Man City could get deleted if it ever goes to AfD due to poor quality sourcing (only one valid source for a couple of sentences). Having said that, you can go ahead and create the article, if reviewers think that there aren't sufficient sources, then it will probably get draftified. We won't know until we see the article itself. Hzh (talk) 18:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. If I can't produce a page good enough then I can look at adding something to Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Women instead; but if we have the THFC page for men, and THFC U21 and Academy for men/boys, and THFCW for women it only seems equitable to try for a THFCW Academy. We'll see. LenF54 (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- I just remembered that there was quite a bit of controversy over a plan to build a women's academy over part of a park in Enfield - . There seem to be a lot of mentions on this in the press from 2021 onwards, so perhaps you might find something about academy itself that you can use. Also googling I see this which has a little bit of info on the academy - . You can start by expanding on the section in Spurs Women page, and wait until that new facility has been built to create the article, or just do it now. Hzh (talk) 18:10, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks. If I can't produce a page good enough then I can look at adding something to Tottenham Hotspur F.C. Women instead; but if we have the THFC page for men, and THFC U21 and Academy for men/boys, and THFCW for women it only seems equitable to try for a THFCW Academy. We'll see. LenF54 (talk) 16:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)
