User talk:Indiancj

You need to source this. Please see WP:Citing sources and give me a yell if you get stuck - there are plenty of examples in the article already, so hopefully you'll figure it out. I could do it for you but then you'll learn nothing and citations are at the very heart of how we do things here ;) - Sitush (talk) 17:17, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

I will do that. Thanks for reminder. Yup! I am learning more and more about Wikipedia :-). But do not get much time for this. :-/

Thanks for having a go, and you were not too far off the mark. It should be {{cite book |title=Studies In Indian History: Rajasthan Through The Ages |volume=3: The Heritage Of Rajputs |first1=R. K. |last1=Gupta |first2=S. R. |last2=Bakshi |publisher=Sarup & Sons |year=2008 |isbn=81-7625-841-5 |url=http://books.google.co.in/books?id=eKGhCWZs59oC&pg=PA65 |page=65}} There are a whole load of cite templates listed at User:Sitush - some people copy them to their own user pages as a reminder. The version ~I give above will produce the result shown below.^[1] - Sitush (talk) 16:19, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi, we do not use British Raj era sources, or even older ones, in caste articles etc. There is a long-standing consensus regarding this and it is why I have reverted you at Kori caste. They are not considered to be reliable and we do not record what unreliable sources say. - Sitush (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kori caste shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 17:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Aside from the above note regarding our three-revert rule, please also familiarise yourself with the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 17:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

The article Banke Chamar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NOTABLE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Smerus (talk) 09:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)