User talk:Inimn

Indus Queen, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 22:29, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Thank you. Inimn (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Spice Bazaar (restaurant) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spice Bazaar (restaurant) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

꧁Zanahary꧂ 17:32, 23 July 2025 (UTC)

The page Shahzad Iqbal has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 14:09, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

I think the page should not be speedy deleted. You have to convert the page into draft space, instead of deleting it directly. I request you to retrieve the page in main space or in draft space. Thank you. – Inimn _(Talk) 14:40, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

No. You should not have recreated a page that was previously deleted by community discussion. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:08, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

The page was deleted in 2020 and i created it in 2025, nearly more than 5 years. Notability has been established in 5 years and Shahzad Iqbal currently regarded as the famous journalist of Pakistan. Notabley he is hosting the current affairs shows in Pakistan, as Naya Pakistan on Geo News. Again requesting you to refund the page, if possible or explain me the reason that why it can't be retrieved. Thank you. – Inimn _(Talk) 17:17, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Please read the notice above in full. The instructions for how to proceed are already there. - UtherSRG (talk) 02:04, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Inimn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

Hello. Hope you all well. I was blocked yesterday and didn't make unblock request immediately. I was blocked unfairly as I did not violated any Wikipedia rules and regulations. I was editing independently and my contributions was neutral and conservative. @Ivanvector: has blocked me directly without addressing any issue. I was not reported by any user on the Sockpuppet Investigations page in which they mentioned me. Also there was no evidence provided in which i was blocked. This is totally unfair to me. There is no evidence and not any issue in which i was involved. Please again review my block. I have improved Wikipedia with my more than one thousand edits in which i responded the semi protected edit requests, Cleanup promotional articles, improve and expand articles, patrolled new pages through new pages feed, encourage new users through welcome, created meaningful articles and many more. I am not connected to any other user, nor used any accounts previously. For note, i edit Wikipedia through my IP address than create this account to benefit more features. I was improving Wikipedia day by day and it was my priority. Unblock me so i can make my beneficial edits again and improve Wikipedia. I can explain more through this talk page if you have any questions. Have a good day. – Inimn _(Talk) 07:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Confirmed SCOT sock. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:24, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User has been blocked as a sockpuppet of StayCalmOnTress, as stated at the SPI socks from this group "should have their talk page and email access revoked due to abuse", emphasis not mine . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk • contribs) 08:15, 29 July 2025 (UTC)