User talk:Ip95DiscussionAccount

Riposte97 I know how Wikipedia treats sources and decided how content is added to article. I have participated in many discussions including this referenced one, from beggining to end. I was IP95 there. What i want does line with policy. It already is in Miitary Frontier article and it went throught a lengthy discussin with an RfC that was formally closed. The problem is that they are on other articles denying this sources and this content and they are banning everyone who opposes them. Just recently they banned a lot of IPs , some are mine some aren't, and they say we all are same user. For the past 10 years they have on Tesla page banned everyone who argued this what I have posted above as socks of o e and the same users. Now they are telling that I'm that user because I argue the same as him. I do argue the same. But that doesn't make me him. It's obvious that they are just banning to prevent this sources enter Tesla article. I don't even want for it to enter the article if they just admit on Talk page that this sources are correct or to present sources of their own if they don't agree. But they are telling everyone on talk page the opposite of tlwhat this sources say. The formulated article content in a way that it omits that info that they deny and are banning anyone who opposes them. And everyone is supposedly one and the same user for the past 10 years. They aren't allowing discussion there. I can't open because they are banning and will ban me. But I think it's a problem if we have 2 wiki articles stating opposite historical facts. I think I can't discuss with this group of users who have an admin among them since their intent is only to have their way by attacking and banning. That's why I tried to point this out on this page to have some previously uninvolved editors notice, but as you say I can't have RfC here since the content isn't disputed here. Ip95DiscussionAccount (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2026 (UTC)