User talk:Jamaru25

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 02:13, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Jamaru25. You've been warned for edit warring at M'semen per the result of the above complaint. You may be blocked the next time you revert that article unless you have obtained a prior consensus for your change on the talk page. Please pay attention to our policy of WP:Reliable sources. If it seems to administrators that you are ignoring that policy, there could be problems for you. If you have questions about policy, please ask any experienced contributor. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:45, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello @EdJohnston:,

• I appreciate your patience with me, but I want you to believe that I have added the first source which it comes form a Moroccan cookbook^[1] returns to the 13 century, even that M.Bitton (talk · contribs) was eager to remove it every time, in the page 72 the writer of this book has mention every single Moroccan dish during Al-Marinid Dynasty including M'semen which is pure Moroccan word and make it pure Moroccan bread, while other North African countries have not until 21 century because of the Media and etc.

• I may look doing wrong from your angle but in my angle I did something good because I edited with a source, while he didn't mentioned any source to defend his changes.

• If Wikipedia based on sources M.Bitton (talk · contribs) I noticed every change he did he have never cited any source which make his changes as false information.

• If Wikipedia wasn't reliable as source why are those people believe in their own researchs ^[2][3]

^{[4] [5]}

• And thank you for your time Mr.Ed Johnston.
  • And this list of my sources:

Jamaru25 (talk) 11:47, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Jamaru25. A book published in the 14th century (1377) may be of historical interest, but it wouldn't normally be used as a reliable source for facts. See WP:PSTS. Instead, we would rely on the work of modern scholars who would interpret the earlier source. You can ask at WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard if you are not convinced. EdJohnston (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello Mr. @EdJohnston:,

• • I am glad that you have shown an interest in my source and also for believing in me, I really appreciate it.
  • I have check it this morning and I found a bit difficult to understand 😅.
  • Let's rely on modern scholars as you mentioned Sir. Jamaru25 (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

I understand why you made those modifications, but you should check the last source which mentions harcha as a "Maghrebi" bread, leaving some doubts about where it is traditionally located. There is no doubt that Morocco (Middle Atlas) is the origin, but it is still uncertain if Algeria is somehow involved or not. Hence the need to keep references to Algeria, and require citations. I hope you understand. -- Ideophagous (talk) 07:05, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello brother, in the first draft there was no mention of Algeria, and this bread is actually Moroccan while Algeria they have no idea about it. They are our neighboring country but they don't know how to make it. It Moroccan not Maghrebi because it doesn't exist in Algeria, Tunisia, and Libya. Jamaru25 (talk) 14:18, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

That guy all he does is attack articles related to Moroccan gastronomy, culture and history He recently attacked Pastilla,Ras el Hanout, Tajine etc...according to him everything was introduced to Morocco from Algeria, if algerian gastronomy was that rich why didn't Tunisia and Libya benefit from it.--Parabenz (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2020 (UTC)