User talk:Jameskida

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Gladiator (2000 film), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Please review WP:OVERLINKING - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:11, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Remember, just because it can be linked doesn't mean it should be. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 20:14, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I'll be more careful next time. Jameskida (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Jameskida! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. You're doing good work so far Squawk7700 (talk) 21:23, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Ohhh... Got it i will be more careful next time thanks for the guidance. Jameskida (talk) 23:17, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mahnoor Cheema and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article.

As mentioned, the individual has received extensive coverage. Due to time constraints, I wasn’t able to include all the references initially. However, that’s not an issue. I now have ample time to address this and will add all the relevant and reliable sources.

One more thing I’d like to ask: Is the information fine in terms of format and content? I’ve done my best to keep the tone neutral and non-promotional. From what I understand, the only issue seems to be the lack of reliable sources. Once that’s resolved, is everything else in order?

Thanks again for your time and valuable feedback! Jameskida (talk) 21:31, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ibjaja055 was:

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not#NEWS and Wikipedia:Notability (people)#People notable for only one event for more information.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahmed el Ahmed and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ibjaja055 (talk) 06:36, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Oh man, yeah—you’re right. I totally agree with the reasons you and @DoubleGrazing gave. I thought his page would get published because of his actions and the huge coverage he received, but things didn’t go the way I expected. No worries though—I’m a beginner and I’m learning new things every time I create or edit pages on Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time. Let’s wait and see. I’ll do my best to keep the page updated with new information. Jameskida (talk) 17:53, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

I lurk around the Teahouse reading every single post, so I can learn as a new-ish editor who's very neurotic about knowing alllll the rules before I contribute more significantly in article space.

Your post helped me learn, and finally look into how to give a Barnstar and the surprising amount of specific, smartly defined "types" of Barnstars one can give! So I want to give you the first Barnstar I'll ever give 😀

Reviewing your talk page and contributions, I am very impressed by how well you take feedback and communicate with other editors in an agreeable, collaborative way. Your Teahouse post showed similar collegial maturity. I've read soooo much of the WP/Talk spaces on en.wiki, going back many years, and the skill of taking constructive criticism with honor and good cheer is WAY more rare than you might realize. In fact, many potentially strong contributors to the 'pedia could not overcome their tendencies to argue against consensus and assume bad faith when experienced Wikipedians are just trying to help them understand the complex, interactive Policies and Guidelines.

In my eyes, the number one best quality a new editor can bring is this attitude of acceptance and civility, and it doesn't come naturally to me as a wound-up anxious person, lol, so you have my utmost respect. These qualities will serve you well in all arenas of life, but they're pretty much a non-negotiable on English Wikipedia, so this Barnstar is well-earned.

(I'm doing this from the mobile app because I'm still a bit overwhelmed with all the options in desktop interface, so I might have to tweak this with a few follow up edits if it doesn't seem to display right!)

		The Civility Barnstar
		For friendly, collegiate communications with other editors, and a rare and admirable humility along the steep learning curve of editing! Sophiatries (talk) 02:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you, Sophia. Your words mean a lot to me. Your words have just made my day, omg I can't explain in words how I'm feeling right now. Jameskida (talk) 17:24, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Jameskida! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 23:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Welcome, welcome, welcome Jameskida! I'm glad that you are joining the March 2026 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Cielquiparle (talk) 10:53, 1 March 2026 (UTC)