User talk:Jbap-11

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Bracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jbap-11! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 23:37, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your review jlwoodwa. I would like to learn how to improve the article so that I can be accepted. To my knowledge, the statements are supported by third party citations. I did use an LLM to the extent of pulling from multiple sources the relevant content and to establish the standard framework of summary, career, awards, legacy. Is there someone I can speak to about how to improve the submission? Jbap-11 (talk) 12:26, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

For example, could I have help to get an example of:

Promotional tone. For example, is it promotional to say "business executlve". The tone seems to be matter of fact?

Editorializing: would like to learn more. I am interested to know how to spot this and self-correct in the future.

Words to watch: there are some in the article, and they appear in the naming of the awards given to Adrian Bracy. Should the awards section be removed is a quesiton.

Vague statments: I'd like to know in the opinion of the viewer what these are. Where they are used, I have attempted to cite a third-party source. For example, her effort to "help women" may sound vague. Attempt was made to cite a source for that.

Essay writing: In reviewing the Wiki guidance on essay writing, this refers to voicing of personal opinion. While I might personally think Bracy, Adrian is noteworthy, didn't feel personal opinions were being shared. Originally this submission was motivated by the Wikipedia page covering Liberty City, a poor district in Miami, and the notable people who came from Liberty City. I saw Adrian was not listed there, so thought to make an update to that page, and that begins with her having a page.

Hallucinations and close pharaphrasing: this is a problem with the draft submission. Thank you for pointing this out. Removed the legacy section entirely as it is hard to find the citations that support those statements, although they may be surmised. I hope that the newly published article meets the standard on this.

I understood that it takes 3 months to get a submission reviewed and I was concerned about losing the work if not submitted and would have time to shore-up the citations. To my surprise I heard back quickly.

Yes, I did use ChatGPT to help consolidate content to form a draft. Yes, I would like to remedy any shortcomings. To my knowledge the statements have ciations from third-parties to support Bracy's work / role / life transitions.

Pls let me know how else I can improve the article. Jbap-11 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is better but I don't see the notability. The biggest thing is this 50 best lists, but being mentioned as one out of 50 really isn't such a huge deal.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Adrian Bracy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 12:58, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Have you considered mentioning her contributions on the Liberty City page? Also, do you know her, and if so how?   — Jeff G. ツ 14:38, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for this suggestion. Just reached out to @57birdnerd about the possibility of that. Jbap-11 (talk) 15:32, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

User:Jeff G. I'm sorry, but I don't think that is a good idea. Drmies (talk) 15:34, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jbap-11. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Adrian Bracy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 18 October 2025 (UTC)