User talk:Jessroman

Hello, Jessroman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 08:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello. In a recent edit to the page Urban resilience, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. TiggerJay (talk) 16:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

At least two of the photographs you use in Draft:Andrea Valsecchi also appear in the marble-bags.com website or the Instagram output of "marblebags". How do you think this has come about? -- Hoary (talk) 12:30, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

I requested the photos directly from Andrea Valsecchi, and he provided them with permission to use them. I’ll ensure the necessary permissions are properly documented on Commons. Do let me know if there’s anything specific you’d like me to clarify. Jessroman (talk) 04:15, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for the quick response. But first, NB that it's the copyright-holders themselves who have to contact Commons for this purpose. And secondly, are you and Valsecchi acquainted in some way? -- Hoary (talk) 11:16, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Permission for the images have already been granted and properly documented on Wikimedia Commons. As for your question, I have no personal acquaintance with Andrea Valsecchi. If you have any concerns regarding the permissions, I suggest referring to the official documentation on Commons. Jessroman (talk) 17:42, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

The improvements you have made are not enough. Among the 19 sources in the draft, only one has significant coverage, which is a magazine feature, but the article is more about Valsecchi Marbles rather than Andrea Valsecchi himself. The reliability of the magazine is also questionable and there is a possibility that the feature was a paid placement, especially since there seems to be no other coverage about this BLP. If it were up to me, I would decline the draft again and if I were you, I would consider working on a different subject instead. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 19:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for your response. However, Your claim that the only notable source is a "magazine feature" that may be a paid placement is speculative and unfounded. If you believe a specific source does not meet reliability standards, I would appreciate a more objective explanation rather than general skepticism. If this draft is to be declined again, I expect a decision based on Wikipedia’s actual guidelines, not subjective speculation. Jessroman (talk) 20:49, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

An article needs at least three reliable, independent sources with significant coverage to be considered notable according to Wikipedia’s guidelines. Currently you have zero among the 19 in your draft, and this is not subjective speculation. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 20:59, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jessroman. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrea Valsecchi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jessroman. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Andrea Valsecchi".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)