User talk:Joy040207

Hi Joy040207! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 22:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Trailblazer101. I noticed that you recently removed content from The Flash (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. There is still no consensus to remove the ratings table per the discussion at Talk:Aquaman and the Lost Kingdom#Ratings table, so it should not be removed from the other article in question because the removals have already been contested. You can't remove something just because you don't like it. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 07:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC) — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 07:01, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

I used to edit Wikipedia and still edit sporadically, and as you may have noticed some recent cleanup of Film Ratings Tables. I've attempted to cleanup and merge what little useful information was in those ratings tables, turning it into prose. I don't expect I'll be able to work on them again soon. Perhaps you might be willing to tackle some of the others? (Don't waste any time on Living in the Age of Airplanes, User Gerald_Waldo_Luis owns that article.)

You'd need to go to Template:Film_and_game_ratings#Template_data and click on the monthly parameter usage report and dig around a bit to check for more articles still (mis)using the Table.

It would be great if you could at least keep an eye on it and maybe help prevent too many more articles starting to use the template, but the usage report only updates once a month if I recall correctly so it was never something that was easy to check regularly. If you can't no worries, thanks for keeping people on the right track and pushing back against this most recent ill advised attempt to revive it. -- 109.76.199.82 (talk) 21:14, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Hello, Joy020407,

I am writing this to you regarding my recent edit to the "Rio" (2011) Wikipedia page! particularly on its genre classification. ​I want to assure you that my intentions for this are not to engage in an "edit warring" crime or to break existing and clear consensus, but rather to improve the accuracy and completeness of the animated film's genre description/s.​ I also understand the importance of avoiding original research (and the "No original research" policy, if any third-party, secondary and generally reliable sources I previously cited, both normally and using the Wayback Machine, were "more original research" and violating of the policy) and respecting the community's policies on Wikipedia, including the 'clear consensus against genre changes' towards certain films on Wikipedia.

My edit to include 'adventure' in the genre, which is refining (not re-classifying) "Rio" as an 'animated musical adventure comedy film", comes from my intention of better reflecting the animated film's core narrative. While I do strongly agree and acknowledge that the animated film is undoubtedly an animated "musical comedy film", its plot is also, without a doubt, driven by a significant journey and pursuit and involving the main characters (Blu and Jewel, two blue macaws) overcoming obstacles (bird smugglers and Nigel the cockatoo) in a challenging environment (Rio de Janeiro). And this component, which marks the core "adventure" of the film, is an essential aspect of its structure, much like the distinction often observed between it and its 2014 sequel "Rio 2", where the former is more adventure-centric (focusing on "adventure" more while retaining core musical and comedic elements) and the latter is more comedy-centric (focusing on "comedy" more and leaving "adventure" as a supporting genre, except for "musical"). (I have no absolute, permanent, or definite intentions to change the genre of "Rio 2" on Wikipedia. You're absolutely right on that after I went through research between the core genres of both films).

I am not attempting to re-classify the film based on my personal opinions or my subjective analysis, but rather to clarify and improve on the existing description to better represent its widely understood elements, other than a "musical" and a "comedy". I am also committed to collaborative editing and am open to discussing this further with you to reach, in collaboration with you, an agreeable resolution that can serve the accuracy and integrity of the article. My aim here is to be a useful contributor, and I hope we can find a way forward that addresses any concerns you still have or previously had with me while also improving the film's article for all readers.

(Also, Joy020407, I understand that my edit has been reverted multiple times and I will stop, if you kindly ask me to. And I don’t want to make myself sound threatening to you (nor repeat myself the same mistake and speak to you in the rude attitude I had towards you (for that I greatly apologize for letting my emotions cloud over my actions)), but I hope that we can be able to settle any possible conflict we've entered in and that you understand that I'm trying not to violate any policies anymore and that I'm trying to improve, not re-classify (based on my unsupported or personal analysis), for better clarification and accuracy of the animated primary genres.) Inanimanitatist (talk) 10:48, 15 March 2026 (UTC)Inanimanitatist