User talk:JudgeMistry

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 11:35, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I cannot complete AFD for Jyoti Singh (judge) JudgeMistry (talk) 21:37, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Greetings! It looks like instead of putting the subst keyword in the wrong place. It should have been {{subst:afd2 | pg=Jyoti Singh (judge) | cat=Category | text=Why the page should be deleted}} ~~~~. I've cleaned it up manually and completed the listing. —C.Fred (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

The discussion will run its course but your rationale for the nomination is mistaken. You could, for instance, say that the article does not show the judge meets notability criteria for a Wikipedia and that you have done additional research in an effort to determine whether additional source exist that might be used. But our criteria for notability for public officials, including judges, say that a judge sitting on the highest court at a state level may well be presumed to be notable. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:01, 2 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks to both editors for your helpful comments and valuable assistance. JudgeMistry (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2025 (UTC).

I feel you may need to read wp:nlt. Slatersteven (talk) 13:44, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

You may also need to read wp:coi, wp:nothere and wp:not. You are supposed to be here to help build an encyclopedia, not act as an advocate. Slatersteven (talk) 13:47, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. — Newslinger talk 12:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. — Newslinger talk 12:25, 8 May 2025 (UTC)