User talk:Jujublibble

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Carbon Creative (November 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
The sources are all either interviews, press releases, or do not discuss this company at all. An article must summarize independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the company that have chosen on their own to write about it.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
331dot (talk) 09:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Jujublibble! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 09:16, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

August 2025

Hello! I noticed your changes at Jakob Nielsen (usability consultant) from yesterday. I saw you added links to external website on the Wikipedia article. Those should only be added at the end of the article in the external links section, and should be very limited (like, one official website, maybe 2 if someone is known for very different topic areas). Much of the material you added were from non-independent primary sources. While they are allowed for non-controversial statements, Wikipedia is mostly interested in what other people say about the topic. Hope that helps! —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:52, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much! Yes, I wasn't sure of they should need included in the body or not. Thankyou for clarifying. ☺️ It's much appreciated. Jujublibble (talk) 01:26, 15 August 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI