User talk:JustChinii

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, JustChinii! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Koualska (talk) 16:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chip's Revenge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chip's Revenge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 04:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello! I've seen that you've created a few articles about episodes of the series, and I just don't think a lot of them can be standalone pages.

I'll take one as an example, taking the sources cited:

• Green Christmas (Big City Greens). Ignoring the official Disney source and the ratings listing, we have:
  • BSC Kids, which appears to be a self-published blog with a team that lists no relevant credentials;
  • A very brief paragraph at AWN, which does not count as significant coverage;
  • An Animation Magazine interview with Chris confirming a holiday episode, which is not a source independent of the creators.

What indicates notability for episodes is "[m]ultiple reviews or other reliable, independent, non-trivial commentary", which is not what we have here. Note that it mentions "multiple" - a single review on something like LaughingPlace.com is not enough. I'm not even that sure LaughingPlace is reliable; their about page doesn't list much experience in writing for reputable publications like The A.V. Club, Vulture and such. The info on writers, ratings, etc. is already at Big City Greens season 2#ep34, so I'm somewhat tempted to just redirect the articles to the corresponding season.

Sorry if this seems demotivational, but I just don't think the episodes demonstrate any substantial sourced analysis or impact. They can easily be covered in the articles about the seasons already. If you have any questions, fell free to ask me or at the Teahouse. Thank you. ObserveOwl (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

I understand. I wasn't thinking that much about the notability of the articles when I was making them. After I had created One Hundred (Big City Greens), I felt motivated to make further articles on episodes that seemed to have enough sources on them. If the articles are eventually redirected, I will respect it. Apologies if I went too far. JustChinii (talk) 22:49, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

It's all good. I'll eventually see what can be done with the articles, checking whether there is potential in any of them, although I'm quite busy now. ObserveOwl (talk) 11:10, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Chip's Revenge.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:19, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:One Hundred (Big City Greens).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 01:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Chipocalypse Now title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 5 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chipocalypse Now is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chipocalypse Now until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 22:20, 27 August 2025 (UTC)

Hello, JustChinii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lourd Asprec, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:07, 2 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello, JustChinii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sonic Blitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:09, 7 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, JustChinii. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Big City Greens season 5".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, JustChinii. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Lourd Asprec".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:26, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, JustChinii. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of The Proud Family characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:08, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cricket's Kapowie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be redirected to Big City Greens season 2.

The article is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cricket's Kapowie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may still edit the article, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.

(Oinkers42) (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2026 (UTC)

Category:Big City Greens characters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 18:32, 28 July 2026 (UTC)