User talk:JustJamie820
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proposed deletion of PPI Motorsports

The article PPI Motorsports has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
100% unverified to a single reliable source (and ergo lacking any evidence for meeting Wikipedia:Notability) for 19.41 years!
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Fourthords | =Λ= | 21:59, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
- I had forgotten I started this article 19 years ago. Yikes. I disagree with it possibly being deleted, since the team won NASCAR and CART races, but I agree it needs lots of work. Do you have any ideas about what is a reliable resource for racing teams...and a proper formatting so that we can get these dumb "Car # Histories" off the page and make it flow better? (This is a gripe I have with EVERY NASCAR team page; is it so hard to be chronological?) I commented in the talk page that I saw an article that said they left Toyota in 2000, but it's got a Wordpress favicon so I know nothing about it's reliability. Because this team was never a big-name, it is very difficult to find anything on a reliable website about them...especially with them no longer existing. Know anything that can help? -- JustJamie820 (talk) 03:25, 25 January 2025 (UTC) (P.S., thanks for ending my six-year Wikipedia editing break. :-P)
John West
Decided to reply here. Don't be too concerned as to why West was deleted. What happened was one editor was making stub after stub of cricket articles based only on databases without showing why they were notable at all, so the community reviewed the guidelines and decided sports players needed at least some significant coverage in order to qualify for an article. The project has really shifted away from people who bulk create articles, and so this article got caught up in all of it... I agree with you that he's probably notable, but the problem with the deletion discussion was simply that enough sources couldn't be easily found in order to save it. The fact he has an extremely common name helps nothing, but I hope that better explains how we got here... SportingFlyer T·C 07:16, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for adding some context to the deletion. Since the whole AFD thread affects my mood too much, all I can say is that, hopefully, my draft on his article will stick this time. I found two mentions of him in British newspapers, one of which has detail not readily available online, and MAYBE that'll be enough to make the past deletion a moot point. And if not, I'll pay for a British Newspapers subscription to find more on him and many others contemporaries. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 07:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Feel free to ping me when you're ready and I'll give you an opinion on whether it'd be deleted or not. SportingFlyer T·C 17:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sporting Flyer: I think it's ready for your opinion. It will still have the usual ESPNcricinfo and CricketArchive sources, of course, and that's probably to be expected from a 19th century cricketer. Often times, I've noticed, stats make up the bulk of notability for cricketers of that vintage. I think what'll help this article survive is a new format, a shinier infobox, and those two links from the British Newspaper Archive. The pre-deletion article lacked all of those things. It should look better, though whether it passes the content test is something I guess I'll find out soon enough. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Great! Can you send me the link to it? SportingFlyer T·C 18:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer: Right here: Draft:John West (cricketer, born 1861) I kept the same title as the old article for consistency. I thought I had given you the link already, but I believe it was another editor I sent it to. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer: I hope I didn't open Pandora's Box by trying to remake this article. I'm already feeling a little flustered. I don't understand what I have to do if old newspapers aren't enough. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- Oh no you're fine, it's just there's an argument about it. I think it'd be kept now if it went to AfD. SportingFlyer T·C 03:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer: I hope I didn't open Pandora's Box by trying to remake this article. I'm already feeling a little flustered. I don't understand what I have to do if old newspapers aren't enough. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2025 (UTC)
- SportingFlyer: Right here: Draft:John West (cricketer, born 1861) I kept the same title as the old article for consistency. I thought I had given you the link already, but I believe it was another editor I sent it to. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 19:12, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Great! Can you send me the link to it? SportingFlyer T·C 18:44, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Sporting Flyer: I think it's ready for your opinion. It will still have the usual ESPNcricinfo and CricketArchive sources, of course, and that's probably to be expected from a 19th century cricketer. Often times, I've noticed, stats make up the bulk of notability for cricketers of that vintage. I think what'll help this article survive is a new format, a shinier infobox, and those two links from the British Newspaper Archive. The pre-deletion article lacked all of those things. It should look better, though whether it passes the content test is something I guess I'll find out soon enough. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 17:29, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
- Feel free to ping me when you're ready and I'll give you an opinion on whether it'd be deleted or not. SportingFlyer T·C 17:10, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:John West (cricketer, born 1861) has a new comment

Your submission at Articles for creation: John West (cricketer, born 1861) (February 26)

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that the appropriate notability criterion is satisfied. In particular, this draft does not appear to indicate that WP:NBIO is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.
You may ask for advice about the notability criteria at the Teahouse.
In particular, see and refer to WP:NBIO for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.
If the new sources are substantially better than the 2022 sources, this draft can be resubmitted, in particular specifying which sources should be analyzed in detail.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John West (cricketer, born 1861) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, JustJamie820!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Kanwat (March 1)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul Kanwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: John West (cricketer, born 1861) has been accepted

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Star Mississippi 02:05, 2 March 2025 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Kanwat (March 4)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul Kanwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
DYK nomination of Cris Tinley
Hello! Your submission of Cris Tinley at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Jordano53 07:24, 12 March 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Rashid Israr
On 13 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rashid Israr, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that it took 12 and a half hours for Rashid Israr to reach his highest score in cricket? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rashid Israr. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rashid Israr), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for Mike Doherty (cricketer)
On 17 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mike Doherty (cricketer), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that former Griqualand West cricketer Mike Doherty was the team's chairman when they won their first trophy in over 100 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mike Doherty (cricketer). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mike Doherty (cricketer)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
DYK for C. G. Joshi
On 23 March 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article C. G. Joshi, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that C. G. Joshi played cricket for Rajasthan at the same time that he ran the fine arts department at Mayo College? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/C. G. Joshi. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, C. G. Joshi), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Wow, you created the LeBron article!
It's cool that you have been active on Wikipedia long enough that you created the first LeBron James article! That is a top tier fun fact to share with people. Thanks for all you do, LeBron-related and otherwise :) Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 20:11, 28 March 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Cris Tinley
On 10 April 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cris Tinley, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Cris Tinley was the youngest-ever cricketer in Nottinghamshire's history for 177 years? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cris Tinley. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cris Tinley), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Shiny stuff
| The Cricket Barnstar | ||
| A token of my gratitude for your GAN review of Chris Benham. AA (talk) 22:09, 18 July 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you, @AssociateAffiliate. Perhaps due to my on-and-off nature of editing, I've never had a barnstar before (and my WP account is older than Twenty20 cricket!)...I'll have to find some way to showcase it. -- JustJamie820 (talk) 00:46, 19 July 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahul Kanwat (July 20)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rahul Kanwat and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your nomination of Cris Tinley is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Cris Tinley is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AssociateAffiliate -- AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:08, 26 July 2025 (UTC)
Your nomination of Cris Tinley has failed
Your good article nomination of the article Cris Tinley has
failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of AssociateAffiliate -- AssociateAffiliate (talk) 10:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Cris Tinley
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 18 November 2025 (UTC)
Holy cow
You're an OG. You created the articled on Alex Rodriguez. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 19:36, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rahul Kanwat
Hello, JustJamie820. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rahul Kanwat, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:08, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Rahul Kanwat

Hello, JustJamie820. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Rahul Kanwat".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
