User talk:Justanothersgwikieditor

Hello there, the edits made to the lead paragraph and infobox on 24 Mar are factual and based on information indicated on SingPost's website and annual report. S ~2026-18340-82 (talk) 02:48, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-18340-82, you had made 2 edits. 1 edit is unsourced (please link to the sources for the article, the Wikipedia:BURDEN is on the editor to introduce it) and the other edit is promotional. Also, you removed maintance tags which should even stay in place after your edits.~ JASWE (talk) 03:36, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

On reread, I will let your edits go through but the maintenance tags will stay on.~ JASWE (talk) 03:42, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello there, the table should remain unchanged and not be subject to conversion, in order to preserve consistency, clarity, and comparability across all years. Maintaining a uniform format allows readers to easily interpret and cross-reference information without confusion or the need to adapt to varying presentation styles. Any alterations in structure or formatting may disrupt continuity, reduce accessibility, and complicate longitudinal analysis. Therefore, retaining a stable and standardized table format is essential for ensuring the integrity, reliability, and usability of the information presented over time. (Unknown152438 (talk) 13:46, 20 April 2026 (UTC))

@Unknown152438, did you just use a LLM to generate this comment? See WP:LLM which does not allow the usage of LLM in all aspects of Wikipedia except the two exceptions. See also WP:AITALK. ~ JASWE (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST does not mean things cannot change. "Your" article had some formatting changes compared to previous years so pretty much you are pointing at yourself. ~ JASWE (talk) 01:52, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled. Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive. Each review will earn 1 point. Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Norman Chui, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:49, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello Justanothersgwikieditor,

Backlog update

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

JTtheOG was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

January–February backlog drive

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

May backlog drive

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.

PageTriage

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.

Reminders:

• You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
• Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
• To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

The edit to article "Mediacorp TV12" used the edit summary "→Singapore Television Twelve: should not be italicised also. abbreviate further mentions". Why should it not be italicised? If "abbreviate further mentions" refers to my edit summary, the editor I was responding to had only 11 edits. Maidenhair (talk) 10:51, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

@Maidenhair, please refer to MOS:ITALIC for details. Typically titles of work or ship etc, or the need for emphasis will be in italics. The station name does not need to be in italics. "Abbreviate further mentions" is still referring to my edit which I abbreviated further mentions of the station name since it has an abbreviation given earlier in the article. ~ JASWE (talk) 14:40, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

with regards to the use of Template:Em, the documentation also said strictly for semantic (meaningful) emphasis, it should not be used for layout, typography conventions (titles, foreign words, scientific names of genera and species, etc.), and other cases that are not true emphasis. so it is not suitable for the title of the station as well. ~ JASWE (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2026 (UTC)