User talk:Karansud1998

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi Karansud1998! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, try the "Suggested edits" module top left on your homepage, or you can always find a task here:

Search the Task Center

Happy editing! Superclusters8 (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohaimina Haque (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by OrangeWaylon was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
OrangeWaylon (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Karansud1998! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! OrangeWaylon (talk) 20:34, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Live Chat Help

Hey, sorry we missed you on the live help chat. Looks like nobody was around to assist. Give WP:AFCHD a go if you still need help. However, please note, we do not accept requests for reviews on the live chat, otherwise everyone would be coming there to "jump the queue". Someone will get round to reviewing at some point, along with the other 2,727 drafts - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:56, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mina Haque (February 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mina Haque, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 19:35, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohaimina Haque (March 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Namita Tudu was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Mina Haque, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Namita Tudu (talk) 06:11, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI