User talk:LakesideMiners

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page United States strikes on alleged drug traffickers during Operation Southern Spear, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A dates error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:42, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi! You are receiving this message because you signed up as a contributor at Wikipedia:WikiLoop DoubleCheck.

We are excited to announce WikiLoop DoubleCheck v5 — a complete ground-up rewrite with direct revert, Twinkle-style patrol features, real-time ML scoring, and three ways to review (web app, userscript, Chrome extension).

Read the full announcement: WikiLoop DoubleCheck v5 newsletter

Thank you for supporting the project! — xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:07, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello sir I edited that page and it took me 5hrs, I edited that page mostly by citing credible and official resources. Qazi Muhammad Farooq was former Chief of Election Commissioner of Pakistan and he died on 27th March 2026.

Kindly redo my edits, as the goal of Wikipedia is to keep its readers updated

Thank You Sir Moazzam Huseini Malik (talk) 17:15, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you reverted my recent edits to the article Antisemitism in Poland, and I’d like to discuss this to better understand your concerns.

My edits were intended to improve compliance with Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy by:

• clarifying attribution of interpretations to specific historians rather than presenting them as uncontested facts
• reducing wording that could be read as implying collective responsibility
• adding broader historical context (e.g., wartime conditions, political factors, and postwar instability)
• ensuring balance in how different perspectives are represented (see WP:UNDUE)

I’m concerned that reverting these changes in full may reintroduce phrasing that could be interpreted as imbalanced or overly reliant on particular interpretations.

If there are specific parts of my edits you disagree with, I’d really appreciate discussing them point by point so we can reach a consensus version. I’m open to refining the wording, as long as we maintain neutrality and proper sourcing.

Thanks, and I look forward to working this out collaboratively. -~2026-22316-36 (talk) 21:45, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

I responded on your talk page LakesideMiners^{Come Talk To Me!} 21:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

I’ve replied on my talk page, but for clarity and ease of discussion, it would probably be best to continue the conversation here or on the article talk page so everything is in one place.

To reiterate briefly: I’m not opposed to correcting any citation issues, but I’m still not seeing clearly identified “massive reference errors” in the edit. Since my changes were primarily rewording existing sourced material, any problems should be specific and identifiable.

If you could point to the exact diffs or passages where references were broken or disconnected, I’ll address them directly. That would be much more productive than general descriptions.

I’m happy to work collaboratively to resolve both sourcing and wording concerns.

-~2026-22316-36 (talk) 21:52, 11 April 2026 (UTC)