User talk:Lemonademan22

Hello, I previously added well-sourced, neutral information to this article, but it was reverted during later edits.

Because the page is semi-protected, I cannot restore it myself. The content complied with WP:BLP and was supported by reliable sources.

I strongly believe that WarGames must be shown as an acomplishment, because they are.

Could an autoconfirmed editor please review my prior edit and restore it if appropriate, please? Thank you. Raul-the-teacher (talk) 00:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

You're right that it was sourced reliably and it was up to BLP standards, that being said, the reason why I reverted your contributions was because it's trivial and not part of the manual of style for professional wrestling articles (see WP:PW/MOS).

I could make up any accomplishment for any wrestler (most titles, most wins, most losses ect.) but that doesn't make it notable simply because I deem it so. On Wikipedia, we only include notable accomplishments (titles, MITB, RR, or an award given to a wrestler by a magazine), which is in line with WP:NOTABLE.

"Championships and accomplishments" isn't meant to be taken too literally, there is a set of what is allowed to be put in that is notable before it gets silly and trivial, as you could put really anything in that section and claim it to be an "accomplishment". Hope this cleared this up though. Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:47, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. ~2026-40567 (talk) 00:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

And can I add that she won WarGames in the Wrestling Carreer section?

Thank you Raul-the-teacher (talk) 00:55, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Go for it! Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:56, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

I was trying to delete my Bron Breakker championship and acomplishments section because what you said, but I click undo instead in your section. I'm so sorry, really. It¡s my first time in wiki. Sorry. Raul-the-teacher (talk) 01:02, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

You're fine. I'll do it for you, no worries. Lemonademan22 (talk) 01:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

There's one more thing, Chris Jericho did not left AEW, he is still listed on the AEW roster page according to Fightful. Just wanna know what you think. ~2026-10728-6 (talk) 05:24, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

DTH89 solved this. Never mind. ~2026-10980-8 (talk) 09:17, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in CM Punk, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. The relevant section here is MOS:CURRENT, which has a supporting essay at WP:CURRENTLY. Your version is less precise and less concise. ―"Ghost of Dan Gurney" _(hihi) 03:56, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

You claim to say that Juggalo Championship Wrestling is not notable but people in the wrestling community will say otherwise. Do your own research. The promotion is on the rise. Almost everyone talked about the heavyweight title win at Hallowicked last year. Unknownuser45266 (talk) 09:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

@Unknownuser45266 I'm well aware you have issues with nobility on wrestling articles.

But it wasn't an excuse to remove content from JCW, it was a reason, a reason Wikipedia itself outlines at WP:NOBILITY. What you wrote is too much for such a small promotion, regardless if it's getting more and more popular, it's not as big as WWE, AEW, TNA, NJPW ect. (all of which have TV deals mind you), it's still an independent promotion which doesn't need the coverage it had on Cardona's page, regardless of how many people talked about whatever, a metric that is besides the point.

I could pay Cardona to wrestle in my back yard, but that doesn't mean I can write a paragraph about it or that it's even notable. Lemonademan22 (talk) 10:58, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

This is the issue with your flawed logic. "I could pay Cardona to wrestle in my back yard, but that doesn't mean I can write a paragraph about it or that it's even notable." and yet Game Changer Wrestling and the NWA despite Cardona's runs in them and their status in pro wrestling as obscure promotions still has paragraphs dedicated to them. With that logic, you might as well remove the content from the pages of wrestlers like Vampiro, Sabu, 2 Tuff Tony, Vince Russo, Trent Acid, Scott Hall, Zach Gowen, etc. Unknownuser45266 (talk) 18:27, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Unknownuser45266 (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Mike Bailey was called Queerball when he wrestled at Effy’s Big Gay Brunch. I attended and I can look for a source material to site. The AEW tag team trio name is Horsecock. Please see this article from fightful. I originally linked a clip from AEW that was hosted on Twitter but it is the exact scene where they name the trios tag team.

https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/aew-star-wanted-horsecock-chant-205348732.html Rwolf691 (talk) 21:53, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Apologies, I thought someone else (not yourself) was adding vandalism edits. If you wish to re-add the content, you can, just be careful with Twitter/X sources per WP:TWITTER try Fightful or WON, instead. That being said the link you sent here is adequate. Lemonademan22 (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

There is a current discussion about Ludwig Kaiser at BLPN WP:BLPUNDEL requires consensus before reinstatement. Morbidthoughts (talk) 01:57, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Aren’t you supposed to seek consensus before you remove it? Surely you can’t remove reliably sourced information and then go "You can’t add it back unless you get consensus!" Seems sketchy to me. Lemonademan22 (talk) 12:06, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

What part of "If it is to be restored without significant change, consensus must be obtained first" do you think is so sketch? Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:05, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Since you've been alerted to BLPs as a contentious topic area, the next reinstatement before obtaining consensus will take the discussion to WP:ARE. Morbidthoughts (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

You have mistaken Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Ludwig Kaiser for the reliably sourced "Personal life" section, when actually it is about unsourced additions that temp accounts have been adding and other editors, including myself, have been reverting. Nowehere does it mention the "Personal life" sourcing. Additionally, Fightful isn't a tabloid website, as you erroneously said, per WP:PW/RS it's reliable and is used on most PW articles. Lemonademan22 (talk) 14:01, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hey, I reverted your reversion of my edit to Zoey Stark. Her height, per ESPN (which is listed as the source of her billed height) is 5'7". 5'8" was first added as an unsourced edit by a temp account whose edit history is mostly making unsourced incorrect edits to pro wrestler's height and weight and hadn't been corrected until I did so (as I did their other edits). Just thought I'd give you a heads up. DragonBrickLayer (talk) 02:30, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, regarding the recent edit I made to LA Knight's real name; The only source on the Wikipedia page for his middle name being "Edward" is an article that only mentions his name as being "Shaun Ricker", no adequate source there. The reason for not citing the source is that it's from a registry voter database, perhaps a little too invasive. The only result for a first name Shaun, last name Ricker with the birthdate of November 1st 1982 in the state voter registry database of Florida is registered one month after the reports of him singing with the WWE and the full name is "Shaun Michael Ricker". Check for yourself, https://registration.dos.fl.gov/en/CheckVoterStatus/Index, I can not upload the direct URL unfortunately. Camacid (talk) 20:24, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

That's all well and good but please read WP:BLPPRIVACY, I used to upload voter stats to wrestlers' pages until I found it it wasn't allowed. Apparently, it is indeed to invasive and isn't allowed to be sourced on Wikipedia. Lemonademan22 (talk) 22:08, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I have seen you reverted an edition by JulajARG. What do you think about the rest of his editions? Jula is removing Spanish terms like máscara, lucha libre or luchadores, changing them with English words. HHH Pedrigree (talk) 10:53, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

@HHH Pedrigree I say revert them too, as it's a page about a luchador. Thus, Spanish terms will suffice. Lemonademan22 (talk) 12:20, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

gringo qliao ~2026-34754-09 (talk) 02:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lemonademan22. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 17:42, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

@Moneytrees: Have the multiple accounts definitely been used abusively here? From what I can see this is a WP:VALIDALT situation (although, admittedly, Lemonademan failed to disclose it, which they should have); looking at the contribution history, Lemonademan uses Stadt67 to edit in entirely different topic areas to this account. I will speak to Lemonademan's quality as an editor, as they have had a positive impact on the professional wrestling sphere of Wikipedia (a space that notoriously has a drought of good editors); in short, Wikipedia would be worse without him. Would you consider removing or shortening the block if he properly disclosed the WP:VALIDALT accounts? — Czello ^(music) 10:15, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

What Czello says is quite true. My reasoning for seperating Lemonademan22 and Stadt64/67 was I wanted to edit outside of PW articles and more "personal" things besides wrestling that I enjoy. I didn't disclose either account because I simply didn't think I needed to. I wasn't vandalising articles, nor was I trying to decieve anybody in doing so. Sure I had a few disputes but I never used either account in favour of one or the other, which is why sockpuppeting is a rule, but since I never used either account to booster my own argument I fail to see the issue. This admittedly looks bad on my behalf but I simply responded on the wrong account and re-did it, nobody would of known who the other person was in the discussion, so I simply reverted and responded on what I use to edit PW articles. Lemonademan22 (talk) 13:31, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry @Czello and Lemonade, but I've dealt with valid alt cases before and this isn't one of them. Look at the article overlap; there's a group of articles both edited in the Wrestling topic, and stuff like this discussion or this edit or this edit are clear examples of using an undisclosed alt to boost an argument/get around reverts. These edits violate a few different rules we have around sock accounts at WP:ILLEGIT. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:25, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I forgot to check which account I was on. I was largely never bothered of the whole thing as I figured it wasn't wrong so I didn't try to hide it apart from keeping both accounts seperate on different projects, even if they crossedover once in a while. This was me simply being truthful, I had been told of WP:ASOF, and was making it be known. This was just me on the Stadt account reverting back to a reversion I made 5 hours previosly and was a response to vandalism. This is fair and I don't even remember doing it or why but it must have been a strict one-off. I had many opportunities to use all three accounts in my advantage across so many disputes, yet never did. Lemonademan22 (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

To be clear, it doesn't matter if you're "in the right" with your reverts; it's still a problem since the accounts are undisclosed, which invertedly or not violates policies related to edit warring and socking. The issue with the Brock Lesnar edits is that you used your account to revert someone else who had reverted your other account. You really shouldn't be editing the same articles with an alt, but that's not the biggest issue here. The problem here is exemplified with you describing the New Day edit as "vandalism"; it's not correct, but it was an apparent good faith edit. There's no reason to have two accounts to make such a revert.

All of that aside, I am willing to unblock you with a one account restriction, which means you'll only be allowed to edit under this account-- no alternate accounts, disclosed or otherwise. If you create more accounts, the indefinite block will be restored. The restriction would be listed at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Unblock conditions and can be appealed in six months. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:01, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Do I have to wait 6 months for an unblock or do I wait until you do it? Lemonademan22 (talk) 20:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

If you accept the restriction you’ll be unblocked immediately. You can’t appeal the restriction until the six months are up. From there you can ask me or the community (at WP:AN) to lift it. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 21:43, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Just to clarify: Immediate unblock with a restriction which can be appealed in 6 months? Lemonademan22 (talk) 21:54, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Yep. Your other accounts will stay blocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 22:26, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Alright, go for it. Lemonademan22 (talk) 08:41, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Alright, you are now unblocked. Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 16:58, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

@Moneytrees I tried editing Wikipedia today and it says I cannot due to Stadt67 being blocked, yet I'm not even logged in on that account. Why is that happening? Lemonademan22 (talk) 18:19, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

That's because I gave it a hardblock; I've changed to a softblock, so you should be able to edit now? Moneytrees🏝️(Talk) 18:38, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

I am. Thanks! Lemonademan22 (talk) 11:14, 22 June 2026 (UTC)