User talk:Lewisarrhenius

Thanks for uploading File:Apachetvm.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:30, 16 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks. I provided a fair use rationale to the best of my ability. Please advise me if further justification is needed. Lewisarrhenius (talk) 05:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Lewisarrhenius! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Coinbase and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 22:14, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. Will mark my edits appropriately going forward. Lewisarrhenius (talk) 22:28, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

The topic may be notable but currently reads like an advertisement.

Can you please revise the article to provide context to a general audience? The article focuses too much on architecture and applications. Why is this topic notable according to independent sources? Who has talked about it and what have they said?

Also, the article is missing a lead. Include the "Apache TVM" section as a lead instead of as the first section.

Please address the above and resubmit. Thanks!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apache TVM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 02:01, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Greetings.

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback on my article submission. I have revised the article to incorporate more neutral language to the best of my ability and have provided independent sources from adopters of the technology in the compiler industry. I have modeled the structure and tone on the MLIR (software) article which covers a software in the same domain (machine learning compilers). I have used that article as the template for a balanced and encyclopedic approach.

I want to clarify that I have no affiliation with Apache TVM or any related organizations and my goal is to present an informative, unbiased article. I am happy to work collaboratively with you and others to further reduce any language that might seem promotional and to better explain the topic’s broader implications and notability with references to independent sources.

Please let me know how I can improve the article to meet Wikipedia’s standards. I appreciate your guidance and look forward to your response. Lewisarrhenius (talk) 05:09, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Caleb Stanford was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Red text, sentences missing citations, promotional language, lacks context for a general audience. Not sure if it sufficiently demonstrates notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apache TVM and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick follow-up. Could you be more specific with your objections?

> Red text, sentences missing citations, promotional language,

I am happy to resolve the red text. Can you provide me more context on what language is promotional here?

> lacks context for a general audience. Not sure if it sufficiently demonstrates notability.

Can you articulate what makes this software more or less noteworthy than HHVM, Halide, Zig, UWIN and other compiler articles on Wikipedia? I have endeavoured to make the article appeal to an audience on par with these articles. If you could provide an example of an article that you feel is a good template, I would appreciate it. Thank you! Lewisarrhenius (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Lewisarrhenius! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Caleb Stanford (talk) 05:48, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Apachetvm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 8 June 2025 (UTC)

Just wanted to ask if you still wanted to do it. We could do it together, as it seems to be quite a big thing for a single person. Mjg.is.da.best (talk) 08:45, 12 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Lewisarrhenius. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Apache TVM, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Lewisarrhenius. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Apache TVM".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 17:25, 6 December 2025 (UTC)