User talk:Lightnightx3x

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you recently removed content from Attempts to overturn the 2020 United States presidential election without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did at 2024 Tirana teen stabbing, you may be blocked from editing. CoconutOctopus talk 12:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Specifically, stop adding the name of the suspect. CoconutOctopus talk 12:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Understandable. Thank you for warning me. Won't happen again. Lightnightx3x (talk) 12:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Tirana teen stabbing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Tirana teen stabbing until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CoconutOctopus talk 18:07, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

I've already had to go to oversight and get this revision deleted once. You really need to stop putting it back. Read WP:LIBEL. Simonm223 (talk) 11:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I said "allegedly". Also he uploaded a picture after he did the crime. But no one is guilty until proven so by a court of law. Lightnightx3x (talk) 12:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Until a court finds him guilty, we can't know for sure. That's why I said "allegedly". Lightnightx3x (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

I now understand that adding the name of the suspect is defamatory. Thank you. Lightnightx3x (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi, as an admin and oversighter with no previous involvement I wanted to drop by and and say please don't re-add the names, at least until things settle down. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Please read WP:OTHERSCOMMENTS. Slatersteven (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Honestly I'm 100% OK with letting their deletion of my comment slide. I asked them to delete their second !vote and, assuming they did that, my comment would have been out of place. But, yeah, for the record @Lightnightx3x you aren't supposed to refactor other people's comments and just because in this limited case I don't personally care doesn't mean you should do it in the future. Simonm223 (talk) 15:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Yours was not the one they deleted []. Slatersteven (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

OK well carry on then. Simonm223 (talk) 16:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

asilvering (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed you recently moved the page Balšić noble family to Balsha noble family. Given its topic area and controversy, it's best to file a request move via WP:RM#CM. This allows you to present arguments on the talk page as to why the page should be moved. If after discussion, there is consensus to change the title, then it will be moved.

I don't have a particular view of it. I just think it's best to do it by requesting a move, rather than arbitrarily moving it. This ensures that there isn't an edit-war caused by it. Thanks. --Griboski (talk) 15:06, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I've noticed you are participating in an RfC on the 2026 Iran War talk page. This is a contentious topic page and, as of my writing this, you do not have the 500 edits required to participate in that particular discussion. Note the warning at the top of the page that states:

• You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)

I see that another user has already posted the template on your talk page. Please take some time to review the restrictions. In the meantime, I would advise striking your comment from the discussion, like so. entropyandvodka | talk 17:39, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

@VidanaliK @JasonMacker Figured I should draw your attention to this before that side thread goes any further. entropyandvodka | talk 19:45, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your time and the introduction. Lightnightx3x (talk) 20:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to 2025–2026 Albanian opposition protests. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because promoting your own drafts to mainspace defeats the purpose of AFC. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cabayi (talk) 13:18, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Promoting your own draft to mainspace because you don't want to wait for review defeats the purpose of WP:AFC. You may resubmit it to the queue when you're ready. Cabayi (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2026 (UTC)