User talk:Lopsd

Hi Lopsd! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 18:15, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

thank you Lopsd (talk) 18:22, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

It looks in decent shape. Some of his listed roles are very minor, so you might want to read over WP:NACTOR to make sure he qualifies as having had significant roles. You can also ask at the noticeboard for living persons, Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard or at the Teahouse if you're not sure. In the meantime, I see the article is waiting for a reviewer, so an experienced editor will be taking a look at it then; it can be a little while to get reviewed, so be patient. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Ganesha811 (talk) 16:25, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shadow Cop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Lam. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

thank you for letting me know, it was automated so I just pressed it thank you for letting me know Lopsd (talk) 19:58, 20 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You can follow the instructions and guidelines written here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. However, you should know that you will need more experience before becoming an AfC reviewer. Your account is required to be at least 90 days old, and to have contributed 500 edits to articles. I recommend waiting for even longer than that to make sure you thoroughly understand our policies and guidelines before applying. It's a great role, and we'd appreciate you volunteering, but be patient and enjoy contributing to articles yourself before beginning to review them. —Ganesha811 (talk) 11:57, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

sounds great I would love to do it I will be grinding thank you. Lopsd (talk) 12:05, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I'm not sure that Getty Images, a for-profit photography license company, is a reliable source for this. Bearian (talk) 18:41, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

yea I know, I could find a single things that was worth adding. I send that and it was like the only thing that could remotely prove he was a real person. Lopsd (talk) 18:42, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know I just added some new ones I found. Lopsd (talk) 18:48, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

I saw that you just blanked the submission at Draft:Malachi Beasley. Would you like the page to be deleted? TornadoLGS (talk) 03:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

yes please thank you Lopsd (talk) 03:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Malachi Beasley here is the article I moved it to main space please take all action and edits thank you !! Lopsd (talk) 03:20, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Why did you decide to move this article to mainspace when it was previously declined on November 26 and hadn't been reviewed again since then? Athanelar (talk) 03:22, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

apologies, I had reedited and thought it had enough sources for main page. Thanks for letting me know. Lopsd (talk) 03:29, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

The correct procedure if your article is declined is to make the improvements and then resubmit for review and wait for it to be approved. Circumventing this rereview by moving the article yourself can be seen as WP:Gaming the system to get your article published.

Please also note that the proper way to move an article is with the move tool, as this preserves page history. Please see WP:MOVE for how to move articles properly.

I've already moved the article back to Draft:Malachi Beasley for you to continue working on it and submit it back to review, so do that whenever you feel it's ready. Athanelar (talk) 03:33, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

thanks a lot, again sorry for my misinformed thinking. Lopsd (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

No problem at all; you don't know until you learn, after all, and as you can see mistakes are always fixable! Athanelar (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:07, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

why was I block, I asked a question?? I've been active for 30 + days have 264 edits and created 3 articles I have not done anything to breach guidelines. please remove Lopsd (talk) 23:10, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

im not a sock puppet of anyone, Im a user who just likes actors and why am I being blamed for wanting to create an article a for 19 years actor. I have been nothing but in good faith of wikipedia's guidelines this makes no since. Lopsd (talk) 23:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

can this please be lifted Lopsd (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

since when has asking a question about a deleted article or draft made you a sock puppet that makes no sense. Lopsd (talk) 23:13, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Ponyo^{bons mots}

Hello can you please remove this Lopsd (talk) 23:16, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Was it my IP address? please lift this ban I have been doing nothing but helping for 30 days Lopsd (talk) 23:21, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lopsd (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I am not a sock puppet of anyone Im a user who just likes actors and why am I being blamed for wanting to create an article a for 19 years actor. I have been nothing but in good faith of wikipedia's guidelines this makes no since. Since when has asking a question about a deleted article or draft made you a sock puppet that makes no sense. Me sharing a IP has nothing to do with sock pupating I have been an amazing user. please lift the ban, I can prove my faith.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:30, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Lopsd (talk) 23:23, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

all of my actions on my current account have been in good fait, my IP doesn't prove anything look at my contribution to the community I have made.

From the moment you created yet another account to evade the block on your main account, every single edit is de facto bad faith. You are not permitted to edit this project as long as your original account is blocked; Banned means banned.-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:47, 2 December 2025 (UTC)