User talk:LumenTide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hi LumenTide! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Information icon Hi LumenTide! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Jay8g [VTE] 03:20, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Jay8g! Thanks so much for your message and all the helpful resources. And sorry about mislabelling the edit as minor - eek. It seemed like small part of the whole article, so I thought that must mean 'minor' change. But I understand what you are saying. There's a lot to lean in the beginning! Thanks for your patience;) LumenTide (talk) 05:55, 12 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IiDENTIFii (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi Numberguy6, thanks for the quick feedback! I will start over. LumenTide (talk) 18:23, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, LumenTide! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Hi Numberguy6, The notability aspect is quite hard to navigate at the start - if you could point me to any more insights, that would be very greatly appreciated. In the meantime, I've cut the article back to only a few lines. I hope it's better. If it seems like a lost cause, I will throw in the towel on this one. Looking forward to the next review LumenTide (talk) 19:41, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IiDENTIFii (July 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 19:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks so much RangersRus! I see what you mean. Much appreciated. 2C0F:F4C0:2307:9AB0:519B:F7D:AC00:F085 (talk) 20:03, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:IiDENTIFii

Information icon Hello, LumenTide. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:IiDENTIFii, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:10, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IiDENTIFii

Hello, LumenTide. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "IiDENTIFii".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 20:26, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI