User talk:Magellan Fan

Hello, Magellan Fan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Please join us at Talk:Canada#The official name of Canada is "The Dominion of Canada".Moxy- 03:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)

Copies of Wikipedia are not reliable sources and not acceptable external links in articles per the verifiability policy.

More information DO:, DON'T: ...

When working with references:

DO: Use inline citations (footnotes or shortened footnotes). Keep citations near the material they support, e.g. after the sentence. Say where in the source the information came from. Use a consistent reference style within each article. Consider using citation templates to create a consistent style. Tag under-sourced material with an appropriate inline tag. Tag under-sourced articles with an appropriate header.

DON'T: Don't rely on unreliable sources. Don't cite a source you haven't seen for yourself. Don't add material that's not supported by sources. Don't place external links in the body of articles. Don't add references for obvious information. Don't use all-numeric date formats other than YYYY-MM-DD. Don't change an established reference style without consensus.

Close

..Moxy- 04:06, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Sciencefish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, PDP–Laban, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please don't mark edits as minor when they clearly aren't see Help:Minor edit Sciencefish (talk) 09:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Razdolnoye, Primorsky Krai, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. 50.213.83.65 (talk) 01:25, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

@50.213.83.65 womp womp retigga Magellan Fan (talk) 13:11, 3 July 2025 (UTC)

Is this an admission that you know you’re being disruptive and aren’t going to stop? I can’t think of what else this response might be. 50.213.83.65 (talk) 17:55, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Razdolnoye, Primorsky Krai, you may be blocked from editing. 50.213.83.65 (talk) 22:41, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

Are you going to respond at all, or at least stop being disruptive? 50.213.83.65 (talk) 22:43, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Razdolnoye, Primorsky Krai. 50.213.83.65 (talk) 19:42, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Chinese Communist Party, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Egsan Bacon (talk) 05:12, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

While I and many other editors personally support using the official name "Communist Party of China" and CPC, this is against WP:COMMONNAME and the consensus of a majority of Wikipedia editors who participated in discussions on Talk:Chinese Communist Party. WP:OFFICIAL comes after, not before, WP:COMMONNAME, as was argued and agreed upon on in these discussions. Please refrain from further attempts to make changes contrary to the consensus, as nearly all mentions of Communist Party of China and CPC have been changed to Chinese Communist Party and CCP since the consensus was first reached. In other words, continuing to do such changes is not only a lost cause, but may get you blocked for edit warring and pushing a version of the article that contradicts Wikipedia policy. All the best, CentreLeftRight ✉ 02:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 50.213.83.65 (talk) 16:04, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Razdolnoye, Primorsky Krai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Daedalus969 (talk) 16:21, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:Magellan Fan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. 🧙‍♀️ Children Will Listen (🐄 talk, 🫘 contribs) 16:58, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

• an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
• a workspace for a draft article
• a personal website, blog, or social media site
• a space for self-promotion or other advertising
• a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. Specifically, your "pronouns" section fails WP:POLEMIC and has been removed. EducatedRedneck (talk) 17:01, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges, repeatedly reverting without explanation; chronic civility issues; and personal attacks.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:00, 20 July 2025 (UTC)