User talk:MarbleTangent

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2025

Information icon Please do not introduce links to draft articles in actual articles, as you did to Rivka Ravitz. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:34, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

I apologize. MarbleTangent (talk) 16:37, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
All good, it's a perfectly reasonable mistake to make! If you have questions about editing, the teahouse is a fantastic help channel for newer editors. I hope you enjoy your time here, and happy editing! Taffer😊💬(she/they) 16:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
I'll check it out. Thanks MarbleTangent (talk) 16:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to List of titles and honours of Queen Sofía of Spain. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. It s foolish to misrepresent sources when they are available online. We can simply check them to prove that you have lied about their content. DrKay (talk) 19:53, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yitzhak Ravitz (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AstrooKai were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AstrooKai (Talk) 15:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, MarbleTangent! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AstrooKai (Talk) 15:42, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Royal Family Order of Charles III, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 03:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 17:39, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. DrKay (talk) 05:20, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Can I know what I have done wrong. MarbleTangent (talk) 08:01, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
We don't usually add birth details of minors to wikipedia, unless they are notable. See Wikipedia:Minors and persons judged incompetent for a user essay on the subject and Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons#Privacy of personal information and using primary sources for our official policy. DrKay (talk) 08:35, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I fully understated. That makes seance, and I wont do that again. Would it make seance to restore the chart of her children, without her great-grandchildren? MarbleTangent (talk) 09:15, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
If they can be cited to a reliable source, they can be added. DrKay (talk) 10:30, 27 July 2025 (UTC)
I have reverted your edit because wikipedia, or indeed any wiki or user-generated content, isn't a reliable source. See Wikipedia:Reliable sources#Self-published sources for guidance. DrKay (talk) 05:21, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Prince Michael of Liechtenstein moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prince Michael of Liechtenstein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBritinator (talk) 23:22, 19 July 2025 (UTC)

Thanks, I will look for more info MarbleTangent (talk) 09:57, 20 July 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Oval Office Study

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oval Office Study, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:55, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

Prince Michael of Liechtenstein moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Prince Michael of Liechtenstein. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because issues outlined previously do not appear to have been adequately addressed and it still needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TheBritinator (talk) 18:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Yitzhak Ravitz

Information icon Hello, MarbleTangent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Yitzhak Ravitz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Yitzhak Ravitz

Hello, MarbleTangent. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Yitzhak Ravitz".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Prince Michael of Liechtenstein

Information icon Hello, MarbleTangent. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Prince Michael of Liechtenstein, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:JAMAMBTGE per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JAMAMBTGE. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
asilvering (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI