User talk:Massimilianoconcas0

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Green AI (May 3)

Draft declined
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.
Feedback
The reviewer, SpragueThomson, left the following feedback:
This draft appears to be generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content.

LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

  • hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references.
  • unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual.
  • copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations.

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models for more information.

Next steps

  • Edit Draft:Green AI to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
  • When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
  • If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

Scam warning

SpragueThomsontalk 01:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Massimilianoconcas0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SpragueThomsontalk 01:28, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi Sprague, I'm not sure to understand what are you asking me to do, should I rephrase so that the article doesn't look like written by AI (which I used to format with the right code not for the content) or is there something in the content that is false not accurate...? I'm a researcher on ML and sustainable AI, the Green AI topic was missing from wiki, so thought it was a good thing to fill the gap. Something may look vague because it's a relatively new area, it's a definition that is still find its way in the business but it's a real thing and not having it is a real miss. Please help me to understand how can I help, your reviewer feedback looks vague to me, my limit but I don't feel instructed by words like appears...often...tend and may used in the review, can you please be more specific ? Massimilianoconcas0 (talk) 03:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI