User talk:Meh130

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sun Fellow, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sun Fellow seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sun Fellow, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 09:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Fibre Channel over Ethernet, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://allrss.com/wikipedia.php?title=FCoE. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Panspermia for general discussion of this or other topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See the talk page guidelines for more information. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 02:11, 29 June 2025 (UTC)

My comments on Panspermia were based in science on my my hard science based undergraduate degree. You are wrong to dismiss my comments, because your dismissals are not based on science. Meh130 (talk) 02:14, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

I have noticed the comments leading me here. If it can help, the main issue was chatting about the topic without proposing specific article changes, while also providing sources to support it. Per WP:BOLD, it is also possible to directly edit the article. The important is for the article to be a summary of sources that should also be cited (WP:CITE). 206.248.143.75 (talk) 15:25, 29 July 2025 (UTC)

Why are my original Talk comments not visible, but the rejection of them is? Meh130 (talk) 23:29, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

I found them, and my comments were scientifically valid. Wikipedia loves to label anything that falls outside of the scientific method "pseudoscience", but other equally untestable claims for some reason do not merit criticism. Meh130 (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 08:43, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

I'm posting this because of your ridiciulous attack on Heather Clark Richardson. I strongly suggest you don't try to add anything like that to her article. Doug Weller talk 08:50, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page David Berlinski, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:25, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Only one, and that in 2006. Doug Weller talk 09:34, 1 November 2025 (UTC)