User talk:Mindinfor

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Jackery, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:14, 21 August 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jackery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:12, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello Mindinfor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Mindinfor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Mindinfor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. 331dot (talk) 09:47, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the heads-up. I want to clarify that I am NOT a paid editor, and I have no financial stake or conflict of interest regarding this topic.

I am simply a user of Jackery products and noticed there wasn't a Wikipedia page for it, so I wanted to try creating one. My first attempt was nominated for deletion, so I've been seeking advice at the Help Desk to learn the ropes.

Regarding the tone of my recent drafts: since English is not my first language, I have been using AI tools to help me summarize information and polish the translation to ensure it meets Wikipedia's encyclopedic style.

I appreciate what you said, and I will continue to follow the guidance from the Help Desk to ensure my draft is objective and properly sourced. Thanks! ~~~~ Mindinfor (talk) 09:57, 11 March 2026 (UTC)