User talk:MrBlueDroidTech

Hello. I've noticed you've been making a lot of edits on 2024 United States Senate elections. Would you be able to use Wikipedia's citation generator to generate your inline references as opposed to pasting bare URLs inside of a reference? This would greatly improve the quality of your edits, as it allows the article to provide more thorough information about the source of its information. OutlawRun (talk) 01:06, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

• Please try the citation generator which is built-in to the default Wikipedia editor. See help:referencing for beginners. wp:BAREURLs cause problems with citation maintenance. Thank you for your help! Adakiko (talk) 02:38, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Raladic. I noticed that you recently removed content from Laura Loomer without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Raladic (talk) 02:19, 19 May 2023 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 United States Senate elections, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Craig. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey, so I saw some of your recent edits that involved you replacing Dave's Redistricting App and Secretary of State's report congressional district election results with results from The Downballot. The Downballot explicitly states "Note that these calculations do not include write-in candidates except in rare cases where write-in tallies were unusually high." (https://www.the-downballot.com/p/the-downballots-calculations-of-presidential) about their results. A lot of states (e.g. Alabama, Iowa, and Washington State) certify their election results with write-in votes and the results from Dave's Redistricting App typically include those votes while the results from The Downballot do not. Only some states like California, Connecticut, and Wisconsin actually release congressional district results for statewide elections while most do not. In those cases, I think that those results should be cited since they are actually published by those state's secretaries of state. However, in most cases where there are not congressional district results released by the state, the Dave's Redistricting App results are closer to the actual results than The Downballot results for the reasons I stated above. I read some of your edit summaries in which you state that there are imprecise DRA datasets, which can be true. However, most of those imprecise datasets are user-uploaded. The datasets that are classified as "Builtin" on the app are typically very accurate and practically identical to the actual certified results, more so than The Downballot results, so my preference would be using those in most cases. What are your thoughts on this? Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for helping me. I also wanted to do some of these edits for the sole purpose of adding decimals to the districts for analytic reasons and to correspond with county results. MrBlueDroidTech (talk) 20:34, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

You're welcome. Dave's Redistricting App always includes raw votes so you can divide the results for each candidate by the total number of votes cast in a contest to find out what the results are to any number of significant figures. Thomascampbell123 (talk) 20:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)