User talk:Msivilotti

This is Msivilotti's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter R. Eiseman (March 16)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Ldm1954, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for academics;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

There are many problems here:

1. No boasting please, for instance "fundamental contributions", "highly cited". 2. Everything must be supported by a source. For instance his early life section has no sources. 3. Words claiming he is notable are irrelevant. Please read WP:PROF carefully. We need independent proof, typically major prizes and high citations demonstrated at Scopus or Google Scholar.

4. Are you a friend of his? Is the a COI?

Next steps

Edit Draft:Peter R. Eiseman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Ldm1954 (talk) 09:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Msivilotti! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 09:56, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Peter R. Eiseman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter R. Eiseman. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 13:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Draft:Peter R. Eiseman. When removing a maintenance template, please either ensure that the problem that the template refers to has been resolved, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as this change has been reverted. Take a look at getting started to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter R. Eiseman (March 16)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Ldm1954, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for academics. The draft requires either:

evidence that the subject meets any of the specific criteria for academics;

or multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

As discussed on the talk page, you have not proved notability; resubmitting is premature. So far there is nothing to show a pass of either WP:NPROF or WP:GNG. Unless you can find something there is no point in continuing to submit.

Next steps

Edit Draft:Peter R. Eiseman to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Ldm1954 (talk) 16:37, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Peter R. Eiseman has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Peter R. Eiseman. Thanks! Ldm1954 (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles