User talk:Naruyoko

Hi Naruyoko! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 07:03, 30 August 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for being more specific about your citation concerns and doing it right this time. Of course the next thing to think about is - what happens if nobody responds to these requests in the next week or so? The short answer is that you have just volunteered to hunt for evidence that confirms (or denies!) the assertion and provide the citations yourself. Golden rule of Wikipedia: "if you want anything done properly around here, you have to do it yourself". . 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 23:37, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm A09. An edit you recently made to Google Translate seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. A09|(talk) 17:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

Oops, it was meant to be a genuine edit, but I missed that it broke a heading and forgot to review my changes. I have redone it without breaking it. Thank you for notifying. Naruyoko (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

First and foremost, I have no expertise whatever in the usage of tilde that your edits address, so this is a generic comment that could apply to any article. That rubric out of the way, some thoughts:

• generally when some existing text is uncited and conflicts with a reliable source, I would just delete the existing text. But as the Reimer source is not formally published, I agree that some delay is merited
• nevertheless, rather than the simple {{citation needed}} that you applied, I would have gone straight to {{dubious}}.
  • if you agree and decide to do it, then first you will need to create a new section at talk:tilde called something like "Dubious text at #Abbreviation" (ugly! but it doesn't really matter what you call it as it is just a talk page item). For the long explanation of what to do, see template:dubious.
  • It would be diplomatic to leave a message at talk:Scribal abbreviation to say something simple like "There is a discussion at talk:Tilde#Dubious text at #Abbreviation which may be of interest to editors of this article."

If a defence of the existing text is not offered within a week or so, then just delete it. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for pointing me to next actions. I read the template documentation for {{Dubious}}, but it says it is for information that is sourced. The original assertions did not have citations, so it does not seem applicable. -- Naruyoko (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

You are of course correct. I just knew what it said and didn't bother to check. So give it a week and then chop it if no-one defends it. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:49, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Also, I finally made talk page edits as suggested. --Naruyoko (talk) 02:26, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Hello I’m Johannes from the WMDE Technical Wishes team. Four months ago, we reached out to the community to discuss the new sub-referencing feature we are currently working on. Thank you to everyone who shared their thoughts and feedback on m:Talk:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing or in local village pump discussions!

We would like to ask for your perspective again, because we’ve made changes to the wikitext syntax of sub-referencing, based on the feedback we’ve received and because it’s the only viable way of dealing with some technical limitations. Please visit m:Talk:WMDE Technical Wishes/Sub-referencing#Request for feedback to read more about our approach for inline sub-referencing and share your thoughts. Thanks for your effort!

PS: You are receiving this message, because you signed-up to our sub-referencing newsletter. If you don't want to receive further updates, just remove your name from the list.

Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 15:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Hi I’m Johannes from Wikimedia Deutschland's Technical Wishes team. We are making great strides with the new sub-referencing feature and we’d love to invite you to take part in two activities to help us move this work further:

1. Try it out and share your feedback

   Please try the updated wikitext feature on the beta wiki and let us know what you think, either on our talk page or by booking a call with our UX researcher.

2. Get a sneak peak and help shape the Visual Editor user designs

   Help us test the new design prototypes by participating in user sessions – sign up here to receive an invite. We're especially hoping to speak with people from underrepresented and diverse groups. If that's you, please consider signing up! No prior or extensive editing experience is required. User sessions will start May 14th.

We plan to bring this feature to Wikimedia wikis later this year. We’ll reach out to wikis for piloting in time for deployments. Creators and maintainers of reference-related tools and templates will be contacted beforehand as well. Thank you very much for your support and encouragement so far in helping bring this feature to life!

PS: You are receiving this message, because you signed-up to our sub-referencing newsletter. If you don't want to receive further updates, just remove your name from the list.

Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Greetings from WMDE's Technical Wishes team. Today we've deployed sub-referencing to German Wikipedia, our first pilot wiki. A great milestone after so many years of work!

We'll continue to improve the feature based on community feedback and want to deploy to other pilot wikis in the upcoming months, once we've solved a couple of issues affecting many non-dewiki projects. You are invited to try sub-referencing on betawiki in the meantime.

We are currently thinking about how we could improve VisualEditor support for templates in sub-references if that's desired by the community. Read more about it on our talk page and share your feedback!

As always thank you very much for your support!

PS: You are receiving this message, because you signed-up to our sub-referencing newsletter. If you don't want to receive further updates, just remove your name from the list.

Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)

--Johannes Richter (WMDE) (talk) 15:35, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Flash crash, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:58, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Passive smoking, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters contains an invalid URL. Please edit the article to add the valid URL. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 02:40, 27 March 2026 (UTC)