User talk:Neepn3rf

Hi Neepn3rf! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 15:33, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm LuniZunie. An edit that you recently made to Psychology & Marketing seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – LuniZunie ツ_(talk) 18:43, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Day Traders, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Day Traders until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi - It appears you are using large language models to generate chunks of content for articles, and are adding sources that do not support the content. This series of edits for example. Only the last source about Castaluna supports some of the preceding content. It also appears you are doing these edits on articles that are tagged for being promotional, for some reason. This doesn't help them with the tags; in fact, it makes them worse. This edit added primary sources (the company's own product literature from papersapp.com and readcube.com), which are disallowed because they are unreliable. Please only add encyclopedic content that is supported with good sources. Otherwise, it is considered disruptive, because other users will now have to go through your edits and revert the content, which might be grammatically or even factually correct, but is poorly sourced. Please read about reliable sourcing. STEMinfo (talk) 02:09, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

@Neepn3rf You must respond to this before further editing. Your edits reek of AI. – LuniZunie_(talk) 13:13, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi.

Thank you for your feedback. I understand, and I will read Wikipedia's rules about sources before editing again.

I appreciate your guidance and will be more careful going forward. Neepn3rf (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edits you made did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! – LuniZunie_(talk) 02:21, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi LuniZunie

Sure, since now on I will provide an edit summary for each edit.

Thank you for your help. Neepn3rf (talk) 14:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC)