User talk:Nemov

Just a quick note that in your recent closure comments, you might have meant to say "Consensus against" as outlined at WP:NHC? "No consensus" and "Consensus against" represent two different outcomes. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for the feedback, I've updated the close. Nemov (talk) 12:10, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Doctor Who on a "Media, the arts, and architecture" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 06:31, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, as you can see, there was an initial consensus. The third-party participants agreed not to define a precise origin in the introductory section and to cite Ibn Khaldun's work. Everyone was unanimous on the addition. Something he doesn't want to add. Given the discussion I've tried to initiate, and considering my interlocutor's bad faith—he doesn't want to know anything and only imposes what he wants—can I find a consensus? Haven't I made enough effort on my end, without it seeming to lead anywhere? What's the reason for this? Mhmdgrd (talk) 21:06, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

@Mhmdgrd I don't know what you mean. There's no consensus. At this point, it might be time to drop the stick. Nemov (talk) 21:12, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Why should I be the one to give up? Is it the one who forces the editions, ignoring the remarks of the inter-participant group, who wins the right to do what he wants with the encyclopedia? Is that how the encyclopedia works? Mhmdgrd (talk) 23:57, 16 June 2026 (UTC)