User talk:NikkiAllen99
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is NikkiAllen99's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability (March 7)
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
- Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
- Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
- Essay-like writing
- Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
- Close paraphrasing
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
1. Sources 2, 7-15 (almost half) are WP:PRIMARY. This is fine for uncontroversial claims WP:SELFSOURCE. But the article relies too heavily on them, and this content may not be WP:NOTABLE. 2. Clear LLM authorship. WP:OVERATTRIBUTION throughout. "have been discussed in local media coverage", "have periodically drawn attention", "coverage of ethics", "reporting likewise noted". Please rewrite with human hands and remove all LLM hallucinations, WP:AIPUFFERY, etc.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
 |
Hello, NikkiAllen99!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SocDoneLeft (talk) 15:27, 7 March 2026 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: District of Columbia Open Meetings Act (March 7)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Most section have no citations at all. Even WP:SELFSOURCE would be better. But please find reliable, secondary (WP:RS, WP:IS) sources with substantial coverage of this act.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:District of Columbia Open Meetings Act and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability (March 10)
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
The comment the reviewer left was:
The draft is MUCH improved, almost ready to publish. 1. Can you please add wikilinks (Help:Link) where appropriate? 2. The "public role" still has "coverage" / "reporting" phrasing. Please tell us what WaPo found, not that WaPo reported. :)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DC Board of Ethics and Government Accountability and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.