User talk:Numinousdei

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ivelisse Valentin Vera requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications is prohibited on Wikipedia. For further information, see section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:34, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to Draft:Ivelisse Valentin Vera seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Thanks. ‑‑gurkubondinn 15:52, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Hello. thanks for your review. All the content was taken from the CV of the person featured in the page. The bio can be verifiable through official (.edu) university websites and peer reviewed academic articles as well as national newspaper. All content was given to the LLM and reviewed by the creator of the page. A language model was only used to generate the coding and review for grammar and coherence. All references are verifiable and placed directly by the creator (me) Numinousdei (talk) 15:55, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

That is prohibited by the WP:NOLLM guideline. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:10, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you attempted with Draft:Ivelisse Valentin Vera in AbuseLog/44621881. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:12, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

The text was all human generated and the LLM only used it to create the coding. It complies with LLM according this guideline (see bellow). Nonetheless the content can be redesigned and rewritten but since the information is correct, the biographical data will remain. I will procede to revise and republish.

Text generated by

large language models

(LLMs) often violates several of

Wikipedia's core content policies

. For this reason,

the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited

, except for the uses as outlined below. See

Wikipedia:Responsibly using large language models

for advice on using LLMs for purposes other than content generation.

1. Editors are permitted to use LLMs to suggest basic copyedits to their own writing, and to incorporate some of them after human review, provided the LLM does not introduce content of its own. Caution is required, because LLMs can go beyond what is asked of them and can change the meaning of the text such that it is not supported by the sources cited. Examples of basic copyedits include spelling, punctuation, and capitalization.

Numinousdei (talk) 16:26, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

What you described ("content was given to the LLM and reviewed by the creator of the page") does not fall into any of those very narrow exceptions ("spelling, punctuation, and capitalization"). ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)