User talk:Offramp249
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
May 2026
Your recent editing history at Pineal gland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing a page's content back to how you believe it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree with your changes. Please stop editing the page and use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution such as a third opinion. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule— if things indicate that you intend to continue reverting content on the page.
This is your second violation of WP:3RR, the other occurring over 20-25 April.
There is an open talk page topic for you to make your case. This is a simple etymology which you want to make elaborate. Please stop and collaborate for WP:CONCISE. Zefr (talk) 20:33, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Offramp249 reported by User:Zefr (Result: ). Thank you. Zefr (talk) 20:40, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} or use the unblock wizard. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:46, 4 May 2026 (UTC)- Fyi, ToBeFree - this user is now under the name, PineballWizzerd224, created on the same day as your block of Offramp249, now actively editing the same topics related to the pineal gland. Special:Diff/1353014316 warning was deleted, reported, and ignored.
- Thanks for your help in clearing up this conspicuous block evasion. Zefr (talk) 18:48, 7 May 2026 (UTC)
- Oh. Thanks for the notification, Zefr, and Ponyo for the quick block! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:06, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.