User talk:Pkirvan

Regarding your deletion of a statement about the SpaceX CRS-4 launch in the List of Falcon 9 launches article, I'm not sure that's quite right. I didn't revert your edit though.

I believe that there were 1) no landing legs on this first stage and 2) no attempt at all made to do a recovery of the stage; i.e., SpaceX acknowledged that the stage would break up/sink rather than float on the ocean for any length of time. That being said, I don't think your statement in the edit comment is correct. You said: "Removed info about CRS-4 landing attempt. Those plans were abandoned at least a week before launch and no controlled descent occurred". I believe they did do the controlled-descent test, and in fact, this time, even did somewhat of a braking burn to alter the course off of the main ballistic reentry trajectory. They just skipped the recovery effort and had no landing legs. N2e (talk) 04:35, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I noticed that you changed content in an article, Boeing 737 MAX, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial.

You keep removing cited content without any supporting citations; update content if needed and add citations. Please review WP:Verify. -Fnlayson (talk) 14:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)

Hi, can you take another look at this edit, as you removed at least one project that is actually under construction (Jurassic solar) and the reference(s) are still active on the web. Braillegrenade (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm not opposed to including prospective solar projects if someone wants to keep it current and complete. The AESO believes 23 solar projects will finish in 2026. Many will get delayed or cancelled so this does entail more work than I'm willing to do, but if someone wants to step up and do it that's great. Pkirvan (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2025 (UTC)