User talk:Politicalenthusiast556

Hi Politicalenthusiast556! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jay8g [V•T•E] 06:22, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Howdy. We don't erase from the infobox, that he was ever premier. GoodDay (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Arpan Khanna, as LLM-generated content is prohibited on Wikipedia. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ‑‑gurkubondinn 18:40, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

@Politicalenthusiast556, can you please explain why you are reinstating these edits on Arpan Khanna? The WP:NOLLM guideline prohibits using AI/LLMs to edit. Could you please self revert and address this? ‑‑gurkubondinn 01:04, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

@Politicalenthusiast556: you are WP:EDITWARRING and you have now crossed the WP:3RR bright red line. Can you please self revert?

You should know that if you don't self revert, then this will most likely go to the WP:AN3 noticeboard which could result in your account being blocked. You have ignored my previous question here, but want to ask you to please stop being disruptive, self revert, and start communicating (either here or on Talk:Arpan Khanna is fine) before you end up with a block. ‑‑gurkubondinn 16:09, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arpan Khanna, you may be blocked from editing. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Your editing is becoming disruptive due to your failure to heed the multiple warnings that have been given. Please understand that one of the requirements for editing on Wikipedia is communicating with fellow editors. While you are not required to respond to every comment on your talk page, failure to respond to any of the multiple warnings, or to heed the advice that has been given, indicates an intentional failure to communicate. Please respond to this message and acknowledge that you understand that communication is required. Additionally please ensure that you have read the multiple warnings that have been given to you on your talk page. Failure to communicate may result in you being blocked from editing. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 16:10, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request through the unblock wizard or through your talk page.  Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 3 July 2026 (UTC)