User talk:Profspeak

There is an editing dispute what Ravi did and was indicted for.
Here is my edit:
The charges stemmed from incidents on September 19 and 21, 2010 in which Ravi pointed his webcam at Ravi's college roommate's bed twice during dates and the second time told 150 of his friends how to view it.^[1]

LedRush wants "The charges stemmed from incidents on September 19 and 21, 2010 in which Ravi used his webcam to view his college roommate kissing another man and told 150 of his friends how to view it. "

The second viewing and telling "everyone" to watch is what got Mr. Ravi indicted on the invasion of privacy charges. Here are the relevant edits:

• (What he did)
• (it is disputed it the camera was ever pointed at the bed)
• (It is undisputed he pointed the camera there twice. Ravi claims he later moved the camera away but does not dispute he pointed the camera there)
• (let's get down to the real issue)

As someone who edits the Clementi article, you may want to review this article as well. Readers searching for Ravi will probably find this article so the more reviewers the better. --Javaweb (talk) 16:05, 14 May 2012 (UTC)Javaweb

I have warned Javaweb against WP:Canvassing, but seeing as it is likely that you will edit that article anyway, I ask only that you do not bring a WP:Battleground mentality there as it appears that SGMD1 and the other editors working on the article are willing to do so ina collaborative manner. This is a real opportunity to make the editing environment more positive and I hope we can all seize it.LedRush (talk) 16:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

I already explained this to you but since you are bringing it up again, I need to repeat myself again. I was pretty sure that Tryptofish and ProfSpeak weren't aware that the new, nearly identical article topic page was active since you had not edited there. As one of the only 2 active editors I knew of on the nearly identical Clementi page not editing the Trial page, I contacted both of them directly. I was concerned that just writing to the Talk page with all of its voluminous text would not get their attention as much as writing to their pages and they would not be aware that an nearly identical article had been published. --Javaweb (talk) 21:05, 15 May 2012 (UTC)Javaweb

You probably read "Eats Shoots & Leaves." The English author's book said punctuation inside quotations was appalling. When her book was edited for US readers, that part of the book was changed. --Javaweb (talk) 17:34, 20 May 2012 (UTC)Javaweb

Profspeak, in this edit , you reverted many edits of mine, including re-adding the POV tag, reintroducing grammatical mistakes, and making other changes with which you might not agree. Would you mind self-reverting and then making only the specific edits you want to make? If you are worried that it is too difficult to get to the version of the article you like, you can click on the version of the article before I edited, and then hit the edit button. You can then copy any section that I touched that you disagree with and paste that into the current version of the article. If you have any issues, I'd be happy to help.

If you intended to make all these changes, also please let me know because there are several non-controversial ones that I will tackle before discussing the bigger issues.LedRush (talk) 21:28, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much, Profspeak!LedRush (talk) 19:04, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)