User talk:PtrWrd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Control copyright icon Hello PtrWrd! Your additions to Paula McCartney have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. veko. (user | talk | contribs) 16:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello, thank you for your message. I know the subject of the page and was adding helpful material found on her website that is all verified and in the public record. No opinions were given. That being said, I appreciate your note and will refrain from such additions in the future. Best wishes, PtrWrd PtrWrd (talk) 18:45, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

June 2025

Information icon Hello, I'm PigeonChickenFish. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sharon Horvath, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The citation you added was from a commercial art gallery PigeonChickenFish (talk) 20:28, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,
Thank you. I wanted to update the list of group shows. The only record is from the gallery itself, either on its own website or their social media – I am certain it is accurate because I attended it. I am new to Wikipedia editing, but is this not sufficient for a citation? Most citations I see for art shows are directly to the gallery site. Thank you. PtrWrd PtrWrd (talk) 20:31, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello PtrWrd, welcome here! Normally we would use a third party source such as a news article or book mention, otherwise its probably not necessary to list it at this time. PigeonChickenFish (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, PtrWrd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! PigeonChickenFish (talk) 00:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Lust (February 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, PtrWrd! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 12:31, 8 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Herbert Lust has been accepted

Herbert Lust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MCE89 (talk) 07:00, 8 March 2026 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the note and for helping improve the article!! PtrWrd (talk) 13:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI