User talk:RealScienceEditor

There has been much disinformation and misunderstanding concerning the similarities of a water ionizer, the process of water electrolysis, and electrolysis used for hydrogen production All three use the same principle of electrolysis. Water ionizers use an electrically charged anode and cathode submerged in water, enabling the production of electrolyzed reduced water.

Peer reviewed research requires disclosure of "Materials and methods" for replication and verification. For example:

"Apparatus producing Electrolyzed Reduced Water (ERW). The apparatus, Antioxidant Water System Health Control for producing the ERW is supplied commercially (Health Control, Taiching, Tawain). The apparatus consists of two parts, one is used for water purification, while the other is used for the electrolysis of water. The equipment for the electolysis of water can control the pH regulator form 8.10 to 9.50 ORP values from -160mV to -400mV and the water flow rate at 2.40 liters per minute. When the switch is turned on, tap water is purified and then electrolyzed through the system to produce the ERW needed. ERW was collect and utilized in this experement." ^[1]

In a recent deletion to the water ionizer Wiki entry, MastCell removed journal citations discussing the effects of electrolyzed reduced water on human and animal health. MastCell, defends his deletions, by commenting, "already discussed on talk page; these refs are not on water ionizers as marketed, and their use to support such devices here constitutes improper synthesis" This discussion was moved from MastCell's talk page to Gillyweed's ^Talk.

The claim of "improper synthesis" is improperly applied because similar "methods and materials" state the use of commercial ionizers in the journal citations MastCell ^Talk has deleted. ^{[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]}

RealScienceEditor (talk) 04:31, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Please note that none of the eight refs cited above are reviews, they are all primary sources in the sense of the term used by WP:MEDRS. To quickly check this, click on the PMID number to link to the PubMed abstract. Once there, select the Medline or XML display format. If Medline is selected, field PT will show the publication type; if XML is selected, then field <PublicationType> will. In either case "Review" is the value that should show in the field. Regards, LeadSongDog come howl 16:09, 8 January 2010 (UTC)